diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | coreutils/printf.c | 5 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | libbb/bb_strtonum.c | 2 | ||||
| -rwxr-xr-x | testsuite/printf.tests | 33 |
3 files changed, 37 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/coreutils/printf.c b/coreutils/printf.c index a666ff7ac..b2429c5cf 100644 --- a/coreutils/printf.c +++ b/coreutils/printf.c @@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ static void print_direc(char *format, unsigned fmt_length, if (have_width - 1 == have_prec) have_width = NULL; + /* multiconvert sets errno = 0, but %s needs it cleared */ errno = 0; switch (format[fmt_length - 1]) { @@ -199,7 +200,7 @@ static void print_direc(char *format, unsigned fmt_length, break; case 'd': case 'i': - llv = my_xstrtoll(argument); + llv = my_xstrtoll(skip_whitespace(argument)); print_long: if (!have_width) { if (!have_prec) @@ -217,7 +218,7 @@ static void print_direc(char *format, unsigned fmt_length, case 'u': case 'x': case 'X': - llv = my_xstrtoull(argument); + llv = my_xstrtoull(skip_whitespace(argument)); /* cheat: unsigned long and long have same width, so... */ goto print_long; case 's': diff --git a/libbb/bb_strtonum.c b/libbb/bb_strtonum.c index 2185017b0..cb70f1053 100644 --- a/libbb/bb_strtonum.c +++ b/libbb/bb_strtonum.c @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ long long FAST_FUNC bb_strtoll(const char *arg, char **endp, int base) /* Check for the weird "feature": * a "-" string is apparently a valid "number" for strto[u]l[l]! * It returns zero and errno is 0! :( */ - first = (arg[0] != '-' ? arg[0] : arg[1]); + first = (arg[0] != '-' && arg[0] != '+' ? arg[0] : arg[1]); if (!isalnum(first)) return ret_ERANGE(); errno = 0; diff --git a/testsuite/printf.tests b/testsuite/printf.tests index 963ded94b..34a65926e 100755 --- a/testsuite/printf.tests +++ b/testsuite/printf.tests @@ -79,6 +79,39 @@ testing "printf understands %Ld" \ "-5\n""0\n" \ "" "" +testing "printf handles positive numbers for %d" \ + "${bb}printf '%d\n' 3 +3 ' 3' ' +3' 2>&1; echo \$?" \ + "3\n"\ +"3\n"\ +"3\n"\ +"3\n""0\n" \ + "" "" + +testing "printf handles positive numbers for %i" \ + "${bb}printf '%i\n' 3 +3 ' 3' ' +3' 2>&1; echo \$?" \ + "3\n"\ +"3\n"\ +"3\n"\ +"3\n""0\n" \ + "" "" + +testing "printf handles positive numbers for %x" \ + "${bb}printf '%x\n' 42 +42 ' 42' ' +42' 2>&1; echo \$?" \ + "2a\n"\ +"2a\n"\ +"2a\n"\ +"2a\n""0\n" \ + "" "" + +testing "printf handles positive numbers for %f" \ + "${bb}printf '%0.3f\n' .42 +.42 ' .42' ' +.42' 2>&1; echo \$?" \ + "0.420\n"\ +"0.420\n"\ +"0.420\n"\ +"0.420\n""0\n" \ + "" "" + + # "FIXED" now to act compatibly ## We are "more correct" here than bash/coreutils: they happily print -2 ## as if it is a huge unsigned number |