| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
I understand why this must be done, though I'm not so happy about having
to do it. In some places, it puts us over 80 chars and we have to break
lines up in further ugly ways. And in general, I think this makes things
harder to read. Yet another thing we must do to please upstream.
Maybe this can be replaced in the future by some kind of automatic
module namespacing logic in the linker, or even combined with LTO and
aggressive symbol stripping.
Suggested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
The kernel has very specific rules correlating file type with comment
type, and also SPDX identifiers can't be merged with other comments.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
It's good to have SPDX identifiers in all files as the Linux kernel
developers are working to add these identifiers to all files.
Update all files with the correct SPDX license identifier based on the license
text of the project or based on the license in the file itself. The SPDX
identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the
full boiler plate text.
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Modified-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
At somepoint we may need to wg_ namespace these.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
Suggested-by: Sultan Alsawaf <sultanxda@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
