| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
There are very few cases, if any, in which a user only wants one of
these levels, so combine it into a single level.
While we're at it, reduce indirection on the loggers by using an empty
function rather than a nil function pointer. It's not like we have
retpolines anyway, and we were always calling through a function with a
branch prior, so this seems like a net gain.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
This commit overhauls wireguard-go's logging.
The primary, motivating change is to use a function instead
of a *log.Logger as the basic unit of logging.
Using functions provides a lot more flexibility for
people to bring their own logging system.
It also introduces logging helper methods on Device.
These reduce line noise at the call site.
They also allow for log functions to be nil;
when nil, instead of generating a log line and throwing it away,
we don't bother generating it at all.
This spares allocation and pointless work.
This is a breaking change, although the fix required
of clients is fairly straightforward.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
|
|
Until we depend on Go 1.16 (which isn't released yet), alias our own
variable to the private member of the net package. This will allow an
easy find replace to make this go away when we eventually switch to
1.16.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
Now that we block when enqueueing to the decryption queue,
there is only one case in which we "drop" a inbound element,
when decryption fails.
We can use a simple, obvious, sync-free sentinel for that, elem.packet == nil.
Also, we can return the message buffer to the pool slightly later,
which further simplifies the code.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
|
|
Block instead. Backpressure here is fine, probably preferable.
This reduces code complexity.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
|
|
This is similar to commit e1fa1cc5560020e67d33aa7e74674853671cf0a0,
but for the decryption channel.
It is an alternative fix to f9f655567930a4cd78d40fa4ba0d58503335ae6a.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
|
|
Some users report seeing lines like:
> Routine: receive incoming IPv4 - stopped
Popping up unexpectedly. Let's sleep and try again before failing, and
also log the error, and perhaps we'll eventually understand this
situation better in future versions.
Because we have to distinguish between the socket being closed
explicitly and whatever error this is, we bump the module to require Go
1.16.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
It's possible for RoutineSequentialReceiver to try to lock an elem after
RoutineDecryption has exited. Before this meant we didn't then unlock
the elem, so the whole program deadlocked.
As well, it looks like the flush code (which is now potentially
unnecessary?) wasn't properly dropping the buffers for the
not-already-dropped case.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
This is particularly problematic on mobile,
where there is a fixed number of elements.
If most of them leak, it'll impact performance;
if all of them leak, the device will permanently deadlock.
I have a test that detects element leaks, which is how I found this one.
There are some remaining leaks that I have not yet tracked down,
but this is the most prominent by far.
I will commit the test when it passes reliably.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
|
|
They're called elem in most places.
Rename a few local variables to make it consistent.
This makes it easier to grep the code for things like elem.Drop.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
|
|
Since we already have it packed into a uint64
in a known byte order, write it back out again
the same byte order instead of copying byte by byte.
This should also generate more efficient code,
because the compiler can do a single uint64 write,
instead of eight bounds checks and eight byte writes.
Due to a missed optimization, it actually generates a mishmash
of smaller writes: 1 byte, 4 bytes, 2 bytes, 1 byte.
This is https://golang.org/issue/41663.
The code is still better than before, and will get better yet
once that compiler bug gets fixed.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
|
|
In each case, the starting waitgroup did nothing but ensure
that the goroutine has launched.
Nothing downstream depends on the order in which goroutines launch,
and if the Go runtime scheduler is so broken that goroutines
don't get launched reasonably promptly, we have much deeper problems.
Given all that, simplify the code.
Passed a race-enabled stress test 25,000 times without failure.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
|
|
fix panic: send on closed channel when remove peer
Signed-off-by: Haichao Liu <liuhaichao@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
The sticky socket code stays in the device package for now,
as it reaches deeply into the peer list.
This is the first step in an effort to split some code out of
the very busy device package.
Signed-off-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@tailscale.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
The rule is to always update them to the full packet size minus UDP/IP
encapsulation for all authenticated packet types.
|
|
Simplification found by staticcheck:
$ staticcheck ./... | grep S1012
device/cookie.go:90:5: should use time.Since instead of time.Now().Sub (S1012)
device/cookie.go:127:5: should use time.Since instead of time.Now().Sub (S1012)
device/cookie.go:242:5: should use time.Since instead of time.Now().Sub (S1012)
device/noise-protocol.go:304:13: should use time.Since instead of time.Now().Sub (S1012)
device/receive.go:82:46: should use time.Since instead of time.Now().Sub (S1012)
device/send.go:132:5: should use time.Since instead of time.Now().Sub (S1012)
device/send.go:139:5: should use time.Since instead of time.Now().Sub (S1012)
device/send.go:235:59: should use time.Since instead of time.Now().Sub (S1012)
device/send.go:393:9: should use time.Since instead of time.Now().Sub (S1012)
ratelimiter/ratelimiter.go:79:10: should use time.Since instead of time.Now().Sub (S1012)
ratelimiter/ratelimiter.go:87:10: should use time.Since instead of time.Now().Sub (S1012)
Change applied using:
$ find . -type f -name "*.go" -exec sed -i "s/Now().Sub(/Since(/g" {} \;
Signed-off-by: Matt Layher <mdlayher@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
