Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich <jo@mein.io>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich <jo@mein.io>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich <jo@mein.io>
|
|
Hide less important fields for mobile views.
Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich <jo@mein.io>
|
|
We must pass to the translate() a string without substituted zone name.
Signed-off-by: Anton Kikin <a.kikin@tano-systems.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich <jo@mein.io>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich <jo@mein.io>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Darius <jok.darius@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich <jo@mein.io>
|
|
'non-wildcard' interfaces enables dnsmasq's '--bind-dynamic' mode.
This binds dynamically to interfaces rather than wildcard addresses
*and* keeps track of interface comings/goings via a unique Linux api.
Quoting dnsmasq's author "bind-dynamic (bind individual addresses,
keep up with changes in interface config) ... On linux, there's actually
no sane reason not to use --bind-dynamic, and it's only not the default
for historical reasons."
listen/exclude interfaces may be used independently of bind dynamic mode
so removed the bogus dependency of 'nonwildcard' enabling access to
'listen/exclude' interfaces - they may be used in any mode.. In fact
the dnsmasq init script takes notice of include/exclude interfaces
irrespective of the 'nonwildcard' parameter.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <ldir@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich <jo@mein.io>
|
|
a bridge
It's completely OK to select a bridge as the underlying interface of
other interfaces, say a tunnel or PPPoE. The only case which should be
forbidden is bridge over bridge.
Signed-off-by: David Yang <mmyangfl@gmail.com>
|
|
This option is usefull to solve some problems with ath10k-ct and random client disconnect. This also adds some extra option to tune inactivity settings
Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
|
|
If we add a new wifi-iface to the config then the iface will start at once.
But normaly we would configure the wireless security in the next step.
Signed-off-by: Florian Eckert <fe@dev.tdt.de>
|
|
Move some common elements to luci-base, and otherwise make three
packages out of status, system, and network. They were mostly
separated already, but there were some shared elements between
status and network that are now in luci-base.
Signed-off-by: Daniel F. Dickinson <cshored@thecshore.com>
|