Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Signed-off-by: Dennis Marttinen <twelho@welho.tech>
|
|
This is just a minor readability improvement that makes `NewInform()`
consistent with the neighboring functions like `NewRequest()`, `NewReply()`,
`NewRelease()` etc. Having the prepended modifiers on the same line helps
with separating the modifiers that provided by the function from the modifiers
passed in by the consumer of the function.
Signed-off-by: Dennis Marttinen <twelho@welho.tech>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dennis Marttinen <twelho@welho.tech>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dennis Marttinen <twelho@welho.tech>
|
|
Signed-off-by: kayos@tcp.direct <kayos@tcp.direct>
|
|
RFC 2131 Section 4.4.1 specifies that REQUEST messages should set
'siaddr' to 0.
Signed-off-by: Chris Koch <chrisko@google.com>
|
|
u-root -> dhcp -> u-root is the circular dependency. Which is fine,
except we messed up modules in u-root big time. We need to break the
circular dep for now.
Signed-off-by: Chris Koch <chrisko@google.com>
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Eugene Burkov <e.burkov@adguard.com>
|
|
RFC 2131 gives two examples of padding in section 4.1. For both the
examples, the 'end' option preceeds the padding with the 'pad' option.
These examples relate to overloading pre-defined fields for options,
not padding the packet for a minimal size.
Older versions of the U-Boot firmware support DHCP, but do not expect
the 'pad' option. The firmware logs the following warning for each
occurence:
*** Unhandled DHCP Option in OFFER/ACK: 0
This warning disappears when the 'end' option preceeds the 'pad'
option.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Moolenaar <mmoolena@amazon.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Chris Koch <chrisko@google.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Hu Jun <hujun.work@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Hu Jun <hujun.work@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Hu Jun <hujun.work@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Hu Jun <hujun.work@gmail.com>
|
|
dhcpv4_release
|
|
There is a special case for when ClientHwAddr is empty, which seems to
only apply when creating a packet with New(), which defaults to
HWType==Ethernet but doesn't assign the ClientHwAddr field.
All the other New*() constructors assign a hardware address and don't
use this codepath
Remove this special case and instead make New() generate an
almost-correct packet in the first place, so that ToBytes() can stay
more generic
Signed-off-by: Anatole Denis <natolumin@unverle.fr>
|
|
When BootFileName is longer than 128 bytes or ServerHostName is longer
than 64 bytes, trying to null-terminate the strings when writing out the
packet causes a panic.
Since the ToBytes() function cannot return errors, silently truncate the
string instead (we do the same with ClientHWAddr if it is longer than 16
bytes for example)
Signed-off-by: Anatole Denis <natolumin@unverle.fr>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Hu Jun <hujun.work@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Hu Jun <hujun.work@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Chris Koch <chrisko@google.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: kevin <kworm@missouri-telecom.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: kevin <kworm@missouri-telecom.com>
|
|
In DHCPv4, when the ParameterRequestList option is not present in a
request, it should be assumed that the client wants to receive all the
options that the server is able to send. This changes the
IsOptionRequested method of dhcpv4.DHCPv4 to return true for any request
in that situation.
The reasoning is based on this wording in
[RFC2131§3.5](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2131#section-3.5):
> Not all clients require initialization of all parameters listed in
> Appendix A. Two techniques are used to reduce the number of
> parameters transmitted from the server to the client. [...] Second, in
> its initial DHCPDISCOVER or DHCPREQUEST message, a client may provide
> the server with a list of specific parameters the client is interested
> in.
Signed-off-by: Anatole Denis <natolumin@unverle.fr>
|
|
Usually this is used for clients that don't know how to receive any
other packets. We can deal with both a unicast or broadcast response
packet, so let's let the server decide on its own.
Signed-off-by: Chris Koch <chrisko@google.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Chris Koch <chrisko@google.com>
|
|
Nobody gives a hoot about the hardware type.
Signed-off-by: Chris Koch <chrisko@google.com>
|
|
- dnsmasq has been seen to null-terminate the bootfile option,
similar treament can occur for tftp-servername (although
tftp-servername option usage is less common).
- for the gateway information to be present in final packet,
the Router option should be queried again in request as
in discover (which matches behavior of udhcpc/dhclient).
Tested: pxeboot with u-root on dnsmask/ipv4 client.
Signed-off-by: Loic Prylli <lprylli@netflix.com>
|
|
|
|
Now the CI will also run golangci-lint
Signed-off-by: Andrea Barberio <insomniac@slackware.it>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Christopher Koch <chrisko@google.com>
|
|
Fixes #246
Signed-off-by: Andrea Barberio <insomniac@slackware.it>
|
|
|
|
Certain older DHCP servers and relay agents follow the RFC 951 BOOTP
standard in which BOOTP/DHCP messages have a 300 byte minimum length.
Signed-off-by: Christopher Koch <chrisko@google.com>
|
|
- Able to send UDP packets before interface is configured.
- Able to use any net.PacketConn.
- RFC2131-compliant retransmission logic.
- Tests.
- Race-condition-averse.
Previous clients (both mine and the ones here) are prone to race
condition errors.
Having one and only one place that calls receive on the socket
"continuously" without having to coordinate hand-offs makes the logic
way easier to follow, and allows for multiple requests in flux at a
time.
Signed-off-by: Christopher Koch <chrisko@google.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
From:
r := GetRouter(d.Options)
To:
r := d.Router()
|
|
From:
r := d.GetOneOption(OptionRouter).(*OptRouter).Routers
d.UpdateOption(&OptRouter{Routers: []net.IP{net.IP{192, 168, 0, 1}}})
To:
r := GetRouter(d.Options)
d.UpdateOption(OptRouter(net.IP{192, 168, 0, 1}, ...))
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also drop unnecessary return value of Modifier.
|
|
Removes AddOption and GetOption.
RFC 2131 specifies that options may only appear once (Section 4.1). If
an option does appear more than once, its byte values must be
concatenated.
RFC 3396 further specifies that to send options longer than 255 bytes,
one option may be split into multiple option codes, which must be
concatenated back together by the receiver.
Both of these are concerned with the byte representation of options.
Fact is, based on both RFCs one can say that an option may only appear
once, but may be composed of multiple values.
Because an option may appear only once logically in any case, we remove
the AddOption and GetOption functions and leave only UpdateOption and
GetOneOption.
Also remove all additions & checks of the End option - the marshaling
and unmarshaling code is exclusively responsible for that now.
|
|
|
|
- Consolidate writing the option code and length to Options.Marshal
rather than doing it in each individual option.
- Use uio in marshaling code.
|
|
|
|
option's codes and lengths were being parsed twice: once in ParseOption
and once in each option type's Parse implementation. Consolidate such
that it only happens once.
Additionally, only pass data to options that they should parse -- we
know the length before the Parse function is called, so the option only
gets to see the data it needs to see.
Also, use uio.Lexer to simplify parsing code in general. Easier to read
and reason about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|