blob: 81fec29e5e4ae9eecb270e9ca5049682031de537 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
|
// Copyright 2020 The gVisor Authors.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
package test
import (
"math/rand"
)
func testInconsistentReturn(tc *oneGuardStruct) { // +checklocksfail
if x := rand.Intn(10); x%2 == 1 {
tc.mu.Lock()
}
}
func testConsistentBranching(tc *oneGuardStruct) {
x := rand.Intn(10)
if x%2 == 1 {
tc.mu.Lock()
} else {
tc.mu.Lock()
}
tc.guardedField = 1
if x%2 == 1 {
tc.mu.Unlock()
} else {
tc.mu.Unlock()
}
}
func testInconsistentBranching(tc *oneGuardStruct) { // +checklocksfail:2
// We traverse the control flow graph in all consistent ways. We cannot
// determine however, that the first if block and second if block will
// evaluate to the same condition. Therefore, there are two consistent
// paths through this code, and two inconsistent paths. Either way, the
// guardedField should be also marked as an invalid access.
x := rand.Intn(10)
if x%2 == 1 {
tc.mu.Lock()
}
tc.guardedField = 1 // +checklocksfail
if x%2 == 1 {
tc.mu.Unlock() // +checklocksforce
}
}
|
