From f82dd8ddb477b8923d1db12654a62d55d613019c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fabricio Voznika Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:22:52 -0700 Subject: Redirect TODO to GitHub issues PiperOrigin-RevId: 323715260 --- pkg/tcpip/stack/nic.go | 2 +- pkg/tcpip/stack/stack_test.go | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'pkg/tcpip/stack') diff --git a/pkg/tcpip/stack/nic.go b/pkg/tcpip/stack/nic.go index fea0ce7e8..9256d4d43 100644 --- a/pkg/tcpip/stack/nic.go +++ b/pkg/tcpip/stack/nic.go @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ func (n *NIC) disableLocked() *tcpip.Error { return nil } - // TODO(b/147015577): Should Routes that are currently bound to n be + // TODO(gvisor.dev/issue/1491): Should Routes that are currently bound to n be // invalidated? Currently, Routes will continue to work when a NIC is enabled // again, and applications may not know that the underlying NIC was ever // disabled. diff --git a/pkg/tcpip/stack/stack_test.go b/pkg/tcpip/stack/stack_test.go index 7657a4101..101ca2206 100644 --- a/pkg/tcpip/stack/stack_test.go +++ b/pkg/tcpip/stack/stack_test.go @@ -867,9 +867,9 @@ func TestRouteWithDownNIC(t *testing.T) { // Writes with Routes that use NIC1 after being brought up should // succeed. // - // TODO(b/147015577): Should we instead completely invalidate all - // Routes that were bound to a NIC that was brought down at some - // point? + // TODO(gvisor.dev/issue/1491): Should we instead completely + // invalidate all Routes that were bound to a NIC that was brought + // down at some point? if err := upFn(s, nicID1); err != nil { t.Fatalf("test.upFn(_, %d): %s", nicID1, err) } -- cgit v1.2.3