summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/test/packetimpact/runner/dut.go
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-11-25[3/3] Support isolated containers for parallel packetimpact testsZeling Feng
To create DUTs in parallel, we need to create goroutines to do the setup. The old code base has a lot of t.Fatal(f) usage in those setup functions which is not great for this change: "FailNow must be called from the goroutine running the test or benchmark function, not from other goroutines created during the test" (https://golang.org/pkg/testing/#T.FailNow). - Cleanup all t.Fatal(f) usage in DUT.Prepare() - use goroutines to create DUTs in parallel PiperOrigin-RevId: 344275809
2020-11-24[2/3] Support isolated containers for parallel packetimpact testsZeling Feng
Added a new flag num_duts to the test runner to create multiple DUTs for the testbench can connect to. PiperOrigin-RevId: 344195435
2020-11-18Remove the redundant containerIP parameterZeling Feng
PiperOrigin-RevId: 343144023
2020-09-23Clean up flag.* usage in packetimpact's runner.RegisterFlagsZeling Feng
PiperOrigin-RevId: 333400865
2020-09-16Cleanup device name confusion in packetimpact testbenchZeling Feng
There are two device names on the test net. - The sniffer/injector device which is always a linux device. Only the testbench library is interested in this device. - The device which is on the DUT. It happens to be the same device as the former if DUT is linux. An individual test might be interested in this device if the test cares about the device name. PiperOrigin-RevId: 332112968
2020-09-11Use correct test device name in Fuchsia packetimpactAmanda Tait
Packetimpact on Fuchsia was formerly using the Linux test device name. This change fixes that. PiperOrigin-RevId: 331211518
2020-09-02Add support to run packetimpact tests against FuchsiaZeling Feng
blaze test <test_name>_fuchsia_test will run the corresponding packetimpact test against fuchsia. PiperOrigin-RevId: 329835290
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2024-12-27 15:58:38 +0000