| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Resume checks the status of the container and unpauses the kernel
if its status is paused. Otherwise nothing happens.
Tests were added to ensure that the process is in the correct state
after various commands.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 201251234
Change-Id: Ifd11b336c33b654fea6238738f864fcf2bf81e19
|
|
Like runc, the pause command will pause the processes of the given container.
It will set that container's status to "paused."
A resume command will be be added to unpause and continue running the process.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 200789624
Change-Id: I72a5d7813d90ecfc4d01cc252d6018855016b1ea
|
|
PiperOrigin-RevId: 200631795
Change-Id: I297fe3e30fb06b04fccd8358c933e45019dcc1fa
|
|
This is the first iteration of checkpoint that actually saves to a file.
Tests for checkpoint are included.
Ran into an issue when private unix sockets are enabled. An error message
was added for this case and the mutex state was set.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 200269470
Change-Id: I28d29a9f92c44bf73dc4a4b12ae0509ee4070e93
|
|
Just a UI/usability addition. It's a lot easier to type "60" than
"60185c721d7e10c00489f1fa210ee0d35c594873d6376b457fb1815e4fdbfc2c".
PiperOrigin-RevId: 199547932
Change-Id: I19011b5061a88aba48a9ad7f8cf954a6782de854
|
|
Checkpoint command is plumbed through container and sandbox.
Restore has also been added but it is only a stub. None of this
works yet. More changes to come.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 199510105
Change-Id: Ibd08d57f4737847eb25ca20b114518e487320185
|
|
This addresses the first issue reported in #59. CRI-O expects runsc to
return success to delete when --force is used with a non-existing container.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 198487418
Change-Id: If7660e8fdab1eb29549d0a7a45ea82e20a1d4f4a
|
|
This is another step towards multi-container support.
Previously, we delivered signals directly to the sandbox process (which then
forwarded the signal to PID 1 inside the sandbox). Similarly, we waited on a
container by waiting on the sandbox process itself. This approach will not work
when there are multiple containers inside the sandbox, and we need to
signal/wait on individual containers.
This CL adds two new messages, ContainerSignal and ContainerWait. These
messages include the id of the container to signal/wait. The controller inside
the sandbox receives these messages and signals/waits on the appropriate
process inside the sandbox.
The container id is plumbed into the sandbox, but it currently is not used. We
still end up signaling/waiting on PID 1 in all cases. Once we actually have
multiple containers inside the sandbox, we will need to keep some sort of map
of container id -> pid (or possibly pid namespace), and signal/kill the
appropriate process for the container.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 197028366
Change-Id: I07b4d5dc91ecd2affc1447e6b4bdd6b0b7360895
|
|
This is a necessary prerequisite for supporting multiple containers in a single
sandbox.
All the commands (in cmd package) now call operations on Containers (container
package). When a Container first starts, it will create a Sandbox with the same
ID.
The Sandbox class is now simpler, as it only knows how to create boot/gofer
processes, and how to forward commands into the running boot process.
There are TODOs sprinkled around for additional support for multiple
containers. Most notably, we need to detect when a container is intended to run
in an existing sandbox (by reading the metadata), and then have some way to
signal to the sandbox to start a new container. Other urpc calls into the
sandbox need to pass the container ID, so the sandbox can run the operation on
the given container. These are only half-plummed through right now.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 196688269
Change-Id: I1ecf4abbb9dd8987a53ae509df19341aaf42b5b0
|
