summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffhomepage
path: root/runsc/container/container.go
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2018-07-02runsc: fix panic for `runsc wait` on stopped container.Lantao Liu
PiperOrigin-RevId: 203016694 Change-Id: Ic51ef754aa6d7d1b3b35491aff96a63d7992e122
2018-06-29Fix typo.Brielle Broder
PiperOrigin-RevId: 202720658 Change-Id: Iff42fd23f831ee7f29ddd6eb867020b76ed1eb23
2018-06-29Added leave-running flag for checkpoint.Brielle Broder
The leave-running flag allows the container to continue running after a checkpoint has occurred by doing an immediate restore into a new container with the same container ID after the old container is destroyed. Updates #80. PiperOrigin-RevId: 202695426 Change-Id: Iac50437f5afda018dc18b24bb8ddb935983cf336
2018-06-28runsc: Add the "wait" subcommand.Kevin Krakauer
Users can now call "runsc wait <container id>" to wait on a particular process inside the container. -pid can also be used to wait on a specific PID. Manually tested the wait subcommand for a single waiter and multiple waiters (simultaneously 2 processes waiting on the container and 2 processes waiting on a PID within the container). PiperOrigin-RevId: 202548978 Change-Id: Idd507c2cdea613c3a14879b51cfb0f7ea3fb3d4c
2018-06-28Wait for sandbox process when waiting for root containerFabricio Voznika
Closes #71 PiperOrigin-RevId: 202532762 Change-Id: I80a446ff638672ff08e6fd853cd77e28dd05d540
2018-06-28Error out if spec is invalidFabricio Voznika
Closes #66 PiperOrigin-RevId: 202496258 Change-Id: Ib9287c5bf1279ffba1db21ebd9e6b59305cddf34
2018-06-25runsc: add a `multi-container` flag to enable multi-container support.Lantao Liu
PiperOrigin-RevId: 201995800 Change-Id: I770190d135e14ec7da4b3155009fe10121b2a502
2018-06-22runsc: Enable waiting on individual containers within a sandbox.Kevin Krakauer
PiperOrigin-RevId: 201742160 Change-Id: Ia9fa1442287c5f9e1196fb117c41536a80f6bb31
2018-06-21Restore implementation added to runsc.Brielle Broder
Restore creates a new container and uses the given image-path to load a saved image of a previous container. Restore command is plumbed through container and sandbox. This command does not work yet - more to come. PiperOrigin-RevId: 201541229 Change-Id: I864a14c799ce3717d99bcdaaebc764281863d06f
2018-06-19runsc: Enable container creation within existing sandboxes.Kevin Krakauer
Containers are created as processes in the sandbox. Of the many things that don't work yet, the biggest issue is that the fsgofer is launched with its root as the sandbox's root directory. Thus, when a container is started and wants to read anything (including the init binary of the container), the gofer tries to serve from sandbox's root (which basically just has pause), not the container's. PiperOrigin-RevId: 201294560 Change-Id: I6423aa8830538959c56ae908ce067e4199d627b1
2018-06-19Added a resume command to unpause a paused container.Justine Olshan
Resume checks the status of the container and unpauses the kernel if its status is paused. Otherwise nothing happens. Tests were added to ensure that the process is in the correct state after various commands. PiperOrigin-RevId: 201251234 Change-Id: Ifd11b336c33b654fea6238738f864fcf2bf81e19
2018-06-15Added code for a pause command for a container process.Justine Olshan
Like runc, the pause command will pause the processes of the given container. It will set that container's status to "paused." A resume command will be be added to unpause and continue running the process. PiperOrigin-RevId: 200789624 Change-Id: I72a5d7813d90ecfc4d01cc252d6018855016b1ea
2018-06-14Fix typo.Brielle Broder
PiperOrigin-RevId: 200631795 Change-Id: I297fe3e30fb06b04fccd8358c933e45019dcc1fa
2018-06-12Runsc checkpoint works.Brielle Broder
This is the first iteration of checkpoint that actually saves to a file. Tests for checkpoint are included. Ran into an issue when private unix sockets are enabled. An error message was added for this case and the mutex state was set. PiperOrigin-RevId: 200269470 Change-Id: I28d29a9f92c44bf73dc4a4b12ae0509ee4070e93
2018-06-06runsc: Support abbreviated container IDs.Kevin Krakauer
Just a UI/usability addition. It's a lot easier to type "60" than "60185c721d7e10c00489f1fa210ee0d35c594873d6376b457fb1815e4fdbfc2c". PiperOrigin-RevId: 199547932 Change-Id: I19011b5061a88aba48a9ad7f8cf954a6782de854
2018-06-06Add runsc checkpoint command.Googler
Checkpoint command is plumbed through container and sandbox. Restore has also been added but it is only a stub. None of this works yet. More changes to come. PiperOrigin-RevId: 199510105 Change-Id: Ibd08d57f4737847eb25ca20b114518e487320185
2018-05-29Supress error when deleting non-existing container with --forceFabricio Voznika
This addresses the first issue reported in #59. CRI-O expects runsc to return success to delete when --force is used with a non-existing container. PiperOrigin-RevId: 198487418 Change-Id: If7660e8fdab1eb29549d0a7a45ea82e20a1d4f4a
2018-05-17Push signal-delivery and wait into the sandbox.Nicolas Lacasse
This is another step towards multi-container support. Previously, we delivered signals directly to the sandbox process (which then forwarded the signal to PID 1 inside the sandbox). Similarly, we waited on a container by waiting on the sandbox process itself. This approach will not work when there are multiple containers inside the sandbox, and we need to signal/wait on individual containers. This CL adds two new messages, ContainerSignal and ContainerWait. These messages include the id of the container to signal/wait. The controller inside the sandbox receives these messages and signals/waits on the appropriate process inside the sandbox. The container id is plumbed into the sandbox, but it currently is not used. We still end up signaling/waiting on PID 1 in all cases. Once we actually have multiple containers inside the sandbox, we will need to keep some sort of map of container id -> pid (or possibly pid namespace), and signal/kill the appropriate process for the container. PiperOrigin-RevId: 197028366 Change-Id: I07b4d5dc91ecd2affc1447e6b4bdd6b0b7360895
2018-05-15Refactor the Sandbox package into Sandbox + Container.Nicolas Lacasse
This is a necessary prerequisite for supporting multiple containers in a single sandbox. All the commands (in cmd package) now call operations on Containers (container package). When a Container first starts, it will create a Sandbox with the same ID. The Sandbox class is now simpler, as it only knows how to create boot/gofer processes, and how to forward commands into the running boot process. There are TODOs sprinkled around for additional support for multiple containers. Most notably, we need to detect when a container is intended to run in an existing sandbox (by reading the metadata), and then have some way to signal to the sandbox to start a new container. Other urpc calls into the sandbox need to pass the container ID, so the sandbox can run the operation on the given container. These are only half-plummed through right now. PiperOrigin-RevId: 196688269 Change-Id: I1ecf4abbb9dd8987a53ae509df19341aaf42b5b0