| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
PiperOrigin-RevId: 217951017
Change-Id: Ie08bf6987f98467d07457bcf35b5f1ff6e43c035
|
|
Containers are created as processes in the sandbox. Of the many things that
don't work yet, the biggest issue is that the fsgofer is launched with its root
as the sandbox's root directory. Thus, when a container is started and wants to
read anything (including the init binary of the container), the gofer tries to
serve from sandbox's root (which basically just has pause), not the container's.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 201294560
Change-Id: I6423aa8830538959c56ae908ce067e4199d627b1
|
|
This is a necessary prerequisite for supporting multiple containers in a single
sandbox.
All the commands (in cmd package) now call operations on Containers (container
package). When a Container first starts, it will create a Sandbox with the same
ID.
The Sandbox class is now simpler, as it only knows how to create boot/gofer
processes, and how to forward commands into the running boot process.
There are TODOs sprinkled around for additional support for multiple
containers. Most notably, we need to detect when a container is intended to run
in an existing sandbox (by reading the metadata), and then have some way to
signal to the sandbox to start a new container. Other urpc calls into the
sandbox need to pass the container ID, so the sandbox can run the operation on
the given container. These are only half-plummed through right now.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 196688269
Change-Id: I1ecf4abbb9dd8987a53ae509df19341aaf42b5b0
|
|
PiperOrigin-RevId: 194583126
Change-Id: Ica1d8821a90f74e7e745962d71801c598c652463
|
