| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
PiperOrigin-RevId: 199808391
Change-Id: Ib37a4fb6193dc85c1f93bc16769d6aa41854b9d4
|
|
Checkpoint command is plumbed through container and sandbox.
Restore has also been added but it is only a stub. None of this
works yet. More changes to come.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 199510105
Change-Id: Ibd08d57f4737847eb25ca20b114518e487320185
|
|
This addresses the first issue reported in #59. CRI-O expects runsc to
return success to delete when --force is used with a non-existing container.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 198487418
Change-Id: If7660e8fdab1eb29549d0a7a45ea82e20a1d4f4a
|
|
This is a necessary prerequisite for supporting multiple containers in a single
sandbox.
All the commands (in cmd package) now call operations on Containers (container
package). When a Container first starts, it will create a Sandbox with the same
ID.
The Sandbox class is now simpler, as it only knows how to create boot/gofer
processes, and how to forward commands into the running boot process.
There are TODOs sprinkled around for additional support for multiple
containers. Most notably, we need to detect when a container is intended to run
in an existing sandbox (by reading the metadata), and then have some way to
signal to the sandbox to start a new container. Other urpc calls into the
sandbox need to pass the container ID, so the sandbox can run the operation on
the given container. These are only half-plummed through right now.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 196688269
Change-Id: I1ecf4abbb9dd8987a53ae509df19341aaf42b5b0
|
|
PiperOrigin-RevId: 194583126
Change-Id: Ica1d8821a90f74e7e745962d71801c598c652463
|
