| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This validates that struct fields if annotated with "// checklocks:mu" where
"mu" is a mutex field in the same struct then access to the field is only
done with "mu" locked.
All types that are guarded by a mutex must be annotated with
// +checklocks:<mutex field name>
For more details please refer to README.md.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 360729328
|
|
This is the RWMutex equivalent to the preceding sync.Mutex CL.
Updates #4804
PiperOrigin-RevId: 345681051
|
|
PiperOrigin-RevId: 345359823
|
|
We would like to track locks ordering to detect ordering violations. Detecting
violations is much simpler if mutexes must be unlocked by the same goroutine
that locked them.
Thus, as a first step to tracking lock ordering, add this lock/unlock
requirement to gVisor's sync.Mutex. This is more strict than the Go standard
library's sync.Mutex, but initial testing indicates only a single lock that is
used across goroutines. The new sync.CrossGoroutineMutex relaxes the
requirement (but will not provide lock order checking).
Due to the additional overhead, enforcement is only enabled with the
"checklocks" build tag. Build with this tag using:
bazel build --define=gotags=checklocks ...
From my spot-checking, this has no changed inlining properties when disabled.
Updates #4804
PiperOrigin-RevId: 343370200
|
|
This enables pre-release testing with 1.16. The intention is to replace these
with a nogo check before the next release.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 328193911
|
|
None of the dependencies have changed in 1.15. It may be possible to simplify
some of the wrappers in rawfile following 1.13, but that can come in a later
change.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 313863264
|
|
PiperOrigin-RevId: 304447031
|
