|
This change makes the checklocks analyzer considerable more powerful, adding:
* The ability to traverse complex structures, e.g. to have multiple nested
fields as part of the annotation.
* The ability to resolve simple anonymous functions and closures, and perform
lock analysis across these invocations. This does not apply to closures that
are passed elsewhere, since it is not possible to know the context in which
they might be invoked.
* The ability to annotate return values in addition to receivers and other
parameters, with the same complex structures noted above.
* Ignoring locking semantics for "fresh" objects, i.e. objects that are
allocated in the local frame (typically a new-style function).
* Sanity checking of locking state across block transitions and returns, to
ensure that no unexpected locks are held.
Note that initially, most of these findings are excluded by a comprehensive
nogo.yaml. The findings that are included are fundamental lock violations.
The changes here should be relatively low risk, minor refactorings to either
include necessary annotations to simplify the code structure (in general
removing closures in favor of methods) so that the analyzer can be easily
track the lock state.
This change additional includes two changes to nogo itself:
* Sanity checking of all types to ensure that the binary and ast-derived
types have a consistent objectpath, to prevent the bug above from occurring
silently (and causing much confusion). This also requires a trick in
order to ensure that serialized facts are consumable downstream. This can
be removed with https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/331789 merged.
* A minor refactoring to isolation the objdump settings in its own package.
This was originally used to implement the sanity check above, but this
information is now being passed another way. The minor refactor is preserved
however, since it cleans up the code slightly and is minimal risk.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 382613300
|
|
We would like to track locks ordering to detect ordering violations. Detecting
violations is much simpler if mutexes must be unlocked by the same goroutine
that locked them.
Thus, as a first step to tracking lock ordering, add this lock/unlock
requirement to gVisor's sync.Mutex. This is more strict than the Go standard
library's sync.Mutex, but initial testing indicates only a single lock that is
used across goroutines. The new sync.CrossGoroutineMutex relaxes the
requirement (but will not provide lock order checking).
Due to the additional overhead, enforcement is only enabled with the
"checklocks" build tag. Build with this tag using:
bazel build --define=gotags=checklocks ...
From my spot-checking, this has no changed inlining properties when disabled.
Updates #4804
PiperOrigin-RevId: 343370200
|
