diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'pkg/seccomp')
| -rw-r--r-- | pkg/seccomp/BUILD | 1 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | pkg/seccomp/seccomp.go | 177 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | pkg/seccomp/seccomp_rules.go | 75 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | pkg/seccomp/seccomp_test.go | 603 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | pkg/seccomp/seccomp_test_victim.go | 2 |
5 files changed, 759 insertions, 99 deletions
diff --git a/pkg/seccomp/BUILD b/pkg/seccomp/BUILD index 29aeaab8c..bdef7762c 100644 --- a/pkg/seccomp/BUILD +++ b/pkg/seccomp/BUILD @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ go_binary( "seccomp_test_victim_amd64.go", "seccomp_test_victim_arm64.go", ], + nogo = False, deps = [":seccomp"], ) diff --git a/pkg/seccomp/seccomp.go b/pkg/seccomp/seccomp.go index 55fd6967e..752e2dc32 100644 --- a/pkg/seccomp/seccomp.go +++ b/pkg/seccomp/seccomp.go @@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ // See the License for the specific language governing permissions and // limitations under the License. -// Package seccomp provides basic seccomp filters for x86_64 (little endian). +// Package seccomp provides generation of basic seccomp filters. Currently, +// only little endian systems are supported. package seccomp import ( @@ -64,9 +65,9 @@ func Install(rules SyscallRules) error { Rules: rules, Action: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, }, - }, defaultAction) + }, defaultAction, defaultAction) if log.IsLogging(log.Debug) { - programStr, errDecode := bpf.DecodeProgram(instrs) + programStr, errDecode := bpf.DecodeInstructions(instrs) if errDecode != nil { programStr = fmt.Sprintf("Error: %v\n%s", errDecode, programStr) } @@ -117,7 +118,7 @@ var SyscallName = func(sysno uintptr) string { // BuildProgram builds a BPF program from the given map of actions to matching // SyscallRules. The single generated program covers all provided RuleSets. -func BuildProgram(rules []RuleSet, defaultAction linux.BPFAction) ([]linux.BPFInstruction, error) { +func BuildProgram(rules []RuleSet, defaultAction, badArchAction linux.BPFAction) ([]linux.BPFInstruction, error) { program := bpf.NewProgramBuilder() // Be paranoid and check that syscall is done in the expected architecture. @@ -128,7 +129,7 @@ func BuildProgram(rules []RuleSet, defaultAction linux.BPFAction) ([]linux.BPFIn // defaultLabel is at the bottom of the program. The size of program // may exceeds 255 lines, which is the limit of a condition jump. program.AddJump(bpf.Jmp|bpf.Jeq|bpf.K, LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, skipOneInst, 0) - program.AddDirectJumpLabel(defaultLabel) + program.AddStmt(bpf.Ret|bpf.K, uint32(badArchAction)) if err := buildIndex(rules, program); err != nil { return nil, err } @@ -144,6 +145,11 @@ func BuildProgram(rules []RuleSet, defaultAction linux.BPFAction) ([]linux.BPFIn // buildIndex builds a BST to quickly search through all syscalls. func buildIndex(rules []RuleSet, program *bpf.ProgramBuilder) error { + // Do nothing if rules is empty. + if len(rules) == 0 { + return nil + } + // Build a list of all application system calls, across all given rule // sets. We have a simple BST, but may dispatch individual matchers // with different actions. The matchers are evaluated linearly. @@ -216,42 +222,163 @@ func addSyscallArgsCheck(p *bpf.ProgramBuilder, rules []Rule, action linux.BPFAc labelled := false for i, arg := range rule { if arg != nil { + // Break out early if using MatchAny since no further + // instructions are required. + if _, ok := arg.(MatchAny); ok { + continue + } + + // Determine the data offset for low and high bits of input. + dataOffsetLow := seccompDataOffsetArgLow(i) + dataOffsetHigh := seccompDataOffsetArgHigh(i) + if i == RuleIP { + dataOffsetLow = seccompDataOffsetIPLow + dataOffsetHigh = seccompDataOffsetIPHigh + } + + // Add the conditional operation. Input values to the BPF + // program are 64bit values. However, comparisons in BPF can + // only be done on 32bit values. This means that we need to do + // multiple BPF comparisons in order to do one logical 64bit + // comparison. switch a := arg.(type) { - case AllowAny: - case AllowValue: - dataOffsetLow := seccompDataOffsetArgLow(i) - dataOffsetHigh := seccompDataOffsetArgHigh(i) - if i == RuleIP { - dataOffsetLow = seccompDataOffsetIPLow - dataOffsetHigh = seccompDataOffsetIPHigh - } + case EqualTo: + // EqualTo checks that both the higher and lower 32bits are equal. high, low := uint32(a>>32), uint32(a) - // assert arg_low == low + + // Assert that the lower 32bits are equal. + // arg_low == low ? continue : violation p.AddStmt(bpf.Ld|bpf.Abs|bpf.W, dataOffsetLow) p.AddJumpFalseLabel(bpf.Jmp|bpf.Jeq|bpf.K, low, 0, ruleViolationLabel(ruleSetIdx, sysno, ruleidx)) - // assert arg_high == high + + // Assert that the lower 32bits are also equal. + // arg_high == high ? continue/success : violation p.AddStmt(bpf.Ld|bpf.Abs|bpf.W, dataOffsetHigh) p.AddJumpFalseLabel(bpf.Jmp|bpf.Jeq|bpf.K, high, 0, ruleViolationLabel(ruleSetIdx, sysno, ruleidx)) labelled = true + case NotEqual: + // NotEqual checks that either the higher or lower 32bits + // are *not* equal. + high, low := uint32(a>>32), uint32(a) + labelGood := fmt.Sprintf("ne%v", i) + + // Check if the higher 32bits are (not) equal. + // arg_low == low ? continue : success + p.AddStmt(bpf.Ld|bpf.Abs|bpf.W, dataOffsetLow) + p.AddJumpFalseLabel(bpf.Jmp|bpf.Jeq|bpf.K, low, 0, ruleLabel(ruleSetIdx, sysno, ruleidx, labelGood)) + + // Assert that the lower 32bits are not equal (assuming + // higher bits are equal). + // arg_high == high ? violation : continue/success + p.AddStmt(bpf.Ld|bpf.Abs|bpf.W, dataOffsetHigh) + p.AddJumpTrueLabel(bpf.Jmp|bpf.Jeq|bpf.K, high, ruleViolationLabel(ruleSetIdx, sysno, ruleidx), 0) + p.AddLabel(ruleLabel(ruleSetIdx, sysno, ruleidx, labelGood)) + labelled = true case GreaterThan: - dataOffsetLow := seccompDataOffsetArgLow(i) - dataOffsetHigh := seccompDataOffsetArgHigh(i) - if i == RuleIP { - dataOffsetLow = seccompDataOffsetIPLow - dataOffsetHigh = seccompDataOffsetIPHigh - } - labelGood := fmt.Sprintf("gt%v", i) + // GreaterThan checks that the higher 32bits is greater + // *or* that the higher 32bits are equal and the lower + // 32bits are greater. high, low := uint32(a>>32), uint32(a) - // assert arg_high < high + labelGood := fmt.Sprintf("gt%v", i) + + // Assert the higher 32bits are greater than or equal. + // arg_high >= high ? continue : violation (arg_high < high) p.AddStmt(bpf.Ld|bpf.Abs|bpf.W, dataOffsetHigh) p.AddJumpFalseLabel(bpf.Jmp|bpf.Jge|bpf.K, high, 0, ruleViolationLabel(ruleSetIdx, sysno, ruleidx)) - // arg_high > high + + // Assert that the lower 32bits are greater. + // arg_high == high ? continue : success (arg_high > high) p.AddJumpFalseLabel(bpf.Jmp|bpf.Jeq|bpf.K, high, 0, ruleLabel(ruleSetIdx, sysno, ruleidx, labelGood)) - // arg_low < low + // arg_low > low ? continue/success : violation (arg_high == high and arg_low <= low) p.AddStmt(bpf.Ld|bpf.Abs|bpf.W, dataOffsetLow) p.AddJumpFalseLabel(bpf.Jmp|bpf.Jgt|bpf.K, low, 0, ruleViolationLabel(ruleSetIdx, sysno, ruleidx)) p.AddLabel(ruleLabel(ruleSetIdx, sysno, ruleidx, labelGood)) labelled = true + case GreaterThanOrEqual: + // GreaterThanOrEqual checks that the higher 32bits is + // greater *or* that the higher 32bits are equal and the + // lower 32bits are greater than or equal. + high, low := uint32(a>>32), uint32(a) + labelGood := fmt.Sprintf("ge%v", i) + + // Assert the higher 32bits are greater than or equal. + // arg_high >= high ? continue : violation (arg_high < high) + p.AddStmt(bpf.Ld|bpf.Abs|bpf.W, dataOffsetHigh) + p.AddJumpFalseLabel(bpf.Jmp|bpf.Jge|bpf.K, high, 0, ruleViolationLabel(ruleSetIdx, sysno, ruleidx)) + // arg_high == high ? continue : success (arg_high > high) + p.AddJumpFalseLabel(bpf.Jmp|bpf.Jeq|bpf.K, high, 0, ruleLabel(ruleSetIdx, sysno, ruleidx, labelGood)) + + // Assert that the lower 32bits are greater (assuming the + // higher bits are equal). + // arg_low >= low ? continue/success : violation (arg_high == high and arg_low < low) + p.AddStmt(bpf.Ld|bpf.Abs|bpf.W, dataOffsetLow) + p.AddJumpFalseLabel(bpf.Jmp|bpf.Jge|bpf.K, low, 0, ruleViolationLabel(ruleSetIdx, sysno, ruleidx)) + p.AddLabel(ruleLabel(ruleSetIdx, sysno, ruleidx, labelGood)) + labelled = true + case LessThan: + // LessThan checks that the higher 32bits is less *or* that + // the higher 32bits are equal and the lower 32bits are + // less. + high, low := uint32(a>>32), uint32(a) + labelGood := fmt.Sprintf("lt%v", i) + + // Assert the higher 32bits are less than or equal. + // arg_high > high ? violation : continue + p.AddStmt(bpf.Ld|bpf.Abs|bpf.W, dataOffsetHigh) + p.AddJumpTrueLabel(bpf.Jmp|bpf.Jgt|bpf.K, high, ruleViolationLabel(ruleSetIdx, sysno, ruleidx), 0) + // arg_high == high ? continue : success (arg_high < high) + p.AddJumpFalseLabel(bpf.Jmp|bpf.Jeq|bpf.K, high, 0, ruleLabel(ruleSetIdx, sysno, ruleidx, labelGood)) + + // Assert that the lower 32bits are less (assuming the + // higher bits are equal). + // arg_low >= low ? violation : continue + p.AddStmt(bpf.Ld|bpf.Abs|bpf.W, dataOffsetLow) + p.AddJumpTrueLabel(bpf.Jmp|bpf.Jge|bpf.K, low, ruleViolationLabel(ruleSetIdx, sysno, ruleidx), 0) + p.AddLabel(ruleLabel(ruleSetIdx, sysno, ruleidx, labelGood)) + labelled = true + case LessThanOrEqual: + // LessThan checks that the higher 32bits is less *or* that + // the higher 32bits are equal and the lower 32bits are + // less than or equal. + high, low := uint32(a>>32), uint32(a) + labelGood := fmt.Sprintf("le%v", i) + + // Assert the higher 32bits are less than or equal. + // assert arg_high > high ? violation : continue + p.AddStmt(bpf.Ld|bpf.Abs|bpf.W, dataOffsetHigh) + p.AddJumpTrueLabel(bpf.Jmp|bpf.Jgt|bpf.K, high, ruleViolationLabel(ruleSetIdx, sysno, ruleidx), 0) + // arg_high == high ? continue : success + p.AddJumpFalseLabel(bpf.Jmp|bpf.Jeq|bpf.K, high, 0, ruleLabel(ruleSetIdx, sysno, ruleidx, labelGood)) + + // Assert the lower bits are less than or equal (assuming + // the higher bits are equal). + // arg_low > low ? violation : success + p.AddStmt(bpf.Ld|bpf.Abs|bpf.W, dataOffsetLow) + p.AddJumpTrueLabel(bpf.Jmp|bpf.Jgt|bpf.K, low, ruleViolationLabel(ruleSetIdx, sysno, ruleidx), 0) + p.AddLabel(ruleLabel(ruleSetIdx, sysno, ruleidx, labelGood)) + labelled = true + case maskedEqual: + // MaskedEqual checks that the bitwise AND of the value and + // mask are equal for both the higher and lower 32bits. + high, low := uint32(a.value>>32), uint32(a.value) + maskHigh, maskLow := uint32(a.mask>>32), uint32(a.mask) + + // Assert that the lower 32bits are equal when masked. + // A <- arg_low. + p.AddStmt(bpf.Ld|bpf.Abs|bpf.W, dataOffsetLow) + // A <- arg_low & maskLow + p.AddStmt(bpf.Alu|bpf.And|bpf.K, maskLow) + // Assert that arg_low & maskLow == low. + p.AddJumpFalseLabel(bpf.Jmp|bpf.Jeq|bpf.K, low, 0, ruleViolationLabel(ruleSetIdx, sysno, ruleidx)) + + // Assert that the higher 32bits are equal when masked. + // A <- arg_high + p.AddStmt(bpf.Ld|bpf.Abs|bpf.W, dataOffsetHigh) + // A <- arg_high & maskHigh + p.AddStmt(bpf.Alu|bpf.And|bpf.K, maskHigh) + // Assert that arg_high & maskHigh == high. + p.AddJumpFalseLabel(bpf.Jmp|bpf.Jeq|bpf.K, high, 0, ruleViolationLabel(ruleSetIdx, sysno, ruleidx)) + labelled = true default: return fmt.Errorf("unknown syscall rule type: %v", reflect.TypeOf(a)) } diff --git a/pkg/seccomp/seccomp_rules.go b/pkg/seccomp/seccomp_rules.go index a52dc1b4e..daf165bbf 100644 --- a/pkg/seccomp/seccomp_rules.go +++ b/pkg/seccomp/seccomp_rules.go @@ -39,28 +39,79 @@ func seccompDataOffsetArgHigh(i int) uint32 { return seccompDataOffsetArgLow(i) + 4 } -// AllowAny is marker to indicate any value will be accepted. -type AllowAny struct{} +// MatchAny is marker to indicate any value will be accepted. +type MatchAny struct{} -func (a AllowAny) String() (s string) { +func (a MatchAny) String() (s string) { return "*" } -// AllowValue specifies a value that needs to be strictly matched. -type AllowValue uintptr +// EqualTo specifies a value that needs to be strictly matched. +type EqualTo uintptr + +func (a EqualTo) String() (s string) { + return fmt.Sprintf("== %#x", uintptr(a)) +} + +// NotEqual specifies a value that is strictly not equal. +type NotEqual uintptr + +func (a NotEqual) String() (s string) { + return fmt.Sprintf("!= %#x", uintptr(a)) +} // GreaterThan specifies a value that needs to be strictly smaller. type GreaterThan uintptr -func (a AllowValue) String() (s string) { - return fmt.Sprintf("%#x ", uintptr(a)) +func (a GreaterThan) String() (s string) { + return fmt.Sprintf("> %#x", uintptr(a)) +} + +// GreaterThanOrEqual specifies a value that needs to be smaller or equal. +type GreaterThanOrEqual uintptr + +func (a GreaterThanOrEqual) String() (s string) { + return fmt.Sprintf(">= %#x", uintptr(a)) +} + +// LessThan specifies a value that needs to be strictly greater. +type LessThan uintptr + +func (a LessThan) String() (s string) { + return fmt.Sprintf("< %#x", uintptr(a)) +} + +// LessThanOrEqual specifies a value that needs to be greater or equal. +type LessThanOrEqual uintptr + +func (a LessThanOrEqual) String() (s string) { + return fmt.Sprintf("<= %#x", uintptr(a)) +} + +type maskedEqual struct { + mask uintptr + value uintptr +} + +func (a maskedEqual) String() (s string) { + return fmt.Sprintf("& %#x == %#x", a.mask, a.value) +} + +// MaskedEqual specifies a value that matches the input after the input is +// masked (bitwise &) against the given mask. Can be used to verify that input +// only includes certain approved flags. +func MaskedEqual(mask, value uintptr) interface{} { + return maskedEqual{ + mask: mask, + value: value, + } } // Rule stores the allowed syscall arguments. // // For example: // rule := Rule { -// AllowValue(linux.ARCH_GET_FS | linux.ARCH_SET_FS), // arg0 +// EqualTo(linux.ARCH_GET_FS | linux.ARCH_SET_FS), // arg0 // } type Rule [7]interface{} // 6 arguments + RIP @@ -89,12 +140,12 @@ func (r Rule) String() (s string) { // rules := SyscallRules{ // syscall.SYS_FUTEX: []Rule{ // { -// AllowAny{}, -// AllowValue(linux.FUTEX_WAIT | linux.FUTEX_PRIVATE_FLAG), +// MatchAny{}, +// EqualTo(linux.FUTEX_WAIT | linux.FUTEX_PRIVATE_FLAG), // }, // OR // { -// AllowAny{}, -// AllowValue(linux.FUTEX_WAKE | linux.FUTEX_PRIVATE_FLAG), +// MatchAny{}, +// EqualTo(linux.FUTEX_WAKE | linux.FUTEX_PRIVATE_FLAG), // }, // }, // syscall.SYS_GETPID: []Rule{}, diff --git a/pkg/seccomp/seccomp_test.go b/pkg/seccomp/seccomp_test.go index 5238df8bd..23f30678d 100644 --- a/pkg/seccomp/seccomp_test.go +++ b/pkg/seccomp/seccomp_test.go @@ -76,11 +76,14 @@ func TestBasic(t *testing.T) { } for _, test := range []struct { + name string ruleSets []RuleSet defaultAction linux.BPFAction + badArchAction linux.BPFAction specs []spec }{ { + name: "Single syscall", ruleSets: []RuleSet{ { Rules: SyscallRules{1: {}}, @@ -88,26 +91,28 @@ func TestBasic(t *testing.T) { }, }, defaultAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + badArchAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD, specs: []spec{ { - desc: "Single syscall allowed", + desc: "syscall allowed", data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, }, { - desc: "Single syscall disallowed", + desc: "syscall disallowed", data: seccompData{nr: 2, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, }, }, }, { + name: "Multiple rulesets", ruleSets: []RuleSet{ { Rules: SyscallRules{ 1: []Rule{ { - AllowValue(0x1), + EqualTo(0x1), }, }, }, @@ -122,30 +127,32 @@ func TestBasic(t *testing.T) { }, }, defaultAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD, + badArchAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD, specs: []spec{ { - desc: "Multiple rulesets allowed (1a)", + desc: "allowed (1a)", data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x1}}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, }, { - desc: "Multiple rulesets allowed (1b)", + desc: "allowed (1b)", data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, }, { - desc: "Multiple rulesets allowed (2)", + desc: "syscall 1 matched 2nd rule", data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, }, { - desc: "Multiple rulesets allowed (2)", + desc: "no match", data: seccompData{nr: 0, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD, }, }, }, { + name: "Multiple syscalls", ruleSets: []RuleSet{ { Rules: SyscallRules{ @@ -157,50 +164,52 @@ func TestBasic(t *testing.T) { }, }, defaultAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + badArchAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD, specs: []spec{ { - desc: "Multiple syscalls allowed (1)", + desc: "allowed (1)", data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, }, { - desc: "Multiple syscalls allowed (3)", + desc: "allowed (3)", data: seccompData{nr: 3, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, }, { - desc: "Multiple syscalls allowed (5)", + desc: "allowed (5)", data: seccompData{nr: 5, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, }, { - desc: "Multiple syscalls disallowed (0)", + desc: "disallowed (0)", data: seccompData{nr: 0, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, }, { - desc: "Multiple syscalls disallowed (2)", + desc: "disallowed (2)", data: seccompData{nr: 2, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, }, { - desc: "Multiple syscalls disallowed (4)", + desc: "disallowed (4)", data: seccompData{nr: 4, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, }, { - desc: "Multiple syscalls disallowed (6)", + desc: "disallowed (6)", data: seccompData{nr: 6, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, }, { - desc: "Multiple syscalls disallowed (100)", + desc: "disallowed (100)", data: seccompData{nr: 100, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, }, }, }, { + name: "Wrong architecture", ruleSets: []RuleSet{ { Rules: SyscallRules{ @@ -210,15 +219,17 @@ func TestBasic(t *testing.T) { }, }, defaultAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + badArchAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD, specs: []spec{ { - desc: "Wrong architecture", + desc: "arch (123)", data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: 123}, - want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD, }, }, }, { + name: "Syscall disallowed", ruleSets: []RuleSet{ { Rules: SyscallRules{ @@ -228,22 +239,24 @@ func TestBasic(t *testing.T) { }, }, defaultAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + badArchAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD, specs: []spec{ { - desc: "Syscall disallowed, action trap", + desc: "action trap", data: seccompData{nr: 2, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, }, }, }, { + name: "Syscall arguments", ruleSets: []RuleSet{ { Rules: SyscallRules{ 1: []Rule{ { - AllowAny{}, - AllowValue(0xf), + MatchAny{}, + EqualTo(0xf), }, }, }, @@ -251,29 +264,31 @@ func TestBasic(t *testing.T) { }, }, defaultAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + badArchAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD, specs: []spec{ { - desc: "Syscall argument allowed", + desc: "allowed", data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0xf, 0xf}}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, }, { - desc: "Syscall argument disallowed", + desc: "disallowed", data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0xf, 0xe}}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, }, }, }, { + name: "Multiple arguments", ruleSets: []RuleSet{ { Rules: SyscallRules{ 1: []Rule{ { - AllowValue(0xf), + EqualTo(0xf), }, { - AllowValue(0xe), + EqualTo(0xe), }, }, }, @@ -281,28 +296,30 @@ func TestBasic(t *testing.T) { }, }, defaultAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + badArchAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD, specs: []spec{ { - desc: "Syscall argument allowed, two rules", + desc: "match first rule", data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0xf}}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, }, { - desc: "Syscall argument allowed, two rules", + desc: "match 2nd rule", data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0xe}}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, }, }, }, { + name: "EqualTo", ruleSets: []RuleSet{ { Rules: SyscallRules{ 1: []Rule{ { - AllowValue(0), - AllowValue(math.MaxUint64 - 1), - AllowValue(math.MaxUint32), + EqualTo(0), + EqualTo(math.MaxUint64 - 1), + EqualTo(math.MaxUint32), }, }, }, @@ -310,9 +327,10 @@ func TestBasic(t *testing.T) { }, }, defaultAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + badArchAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD, specs: []spec{ { - desc: "64bit syscall argument allowed", + desc: "argument allowed (all match)", data: seccompData{ nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, @@ -321,7 +339,7 @@ func TestBasic(t *testing.T) { want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, }, { - desc: "64bit syscall argument disallowed", + desc: "argument disallowed (one mismatch)", data: seccompData{ nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, @@ -330,7 +348,7 @@ func TestBasic(t *testing.T) { want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, }, { - desc: "64bit syscall argument disallowed", + desc: "argument disallowed (multiple mismatch)", data: seccompData{ nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, @@ -341,6 +359,103 @@ func TestBasic(t *testing.T) { }, }, { + name: "NotEqual", + ruleSets: []RuleSet{ + { + Rules: SyscallRules{ + 1: []Rule{ + { + NotEqual(0x7aabbccdd), + NotEqual(math.MaxUint64 - 1), + NotEqual(math.MaxUint32), + }, + }, + }, + Action: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + }, + defaultAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + badArchAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD, + specs: []spec{ + { + desc: "arg allowed", + data: seccompData{ + nr: 1, + arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, + args: [6]uint64{0, math.MaxUint64, math.MaxUint32 - 1}, + }, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + { + desc: "arg disallowed (one equal)", + data: seccompData{ + nr: 1, + arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, + args: [6]uint64{0x7aabbccdd, math.MaxUint64, math.MaxUint32 - 1}, + }, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, + { + desc: "arg disallowed (all equal)", + data: seccompData{ + nr: 1, + arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, + args: [6]uint64{0x7aabbccdd, math.MaxUint64 - 1, math.MaxUint32}, + }, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, + }, + }, + { + name: "GreaterThan", + ruleSets: []RuleSet{ + { + Rules: SyscallRules{ + 1: []Rule{ + { + // 4294967298 + // Both upper 32 bits and lower 32 bits are non-zero. + // 00000000000000000000000000000010 + // 00000000000000000000000000000010 + GreaterThan(0x00000002_00000002), + }, + }, + }, + Action: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + }, + defaultAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + badArchAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD, + specs: []spec{ + { + desc: "high 32bits greater", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x00000003_00000002}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + { + desc: "high 32bits equal, low 32bits greater", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x00000002_00000003}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + { + desc: "high 32bits equal, low 32bits equal", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x00000002_00000002}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, + { + desc: "high 32bits equal, low 32bits less", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x00000002_00000001}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, + { + desc: "high 32bits less", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x00000001_00000003}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, + }, + }, + { + name: "GreaterThan (multi)", ruleSets: []RuleSet{ { Rules: SyscallRules{ @@ -355,46 +470,145 @@ func TestBasic(t *testing.T) { }, }, defaultAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + badArchAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD, specs: []spec{ { - desc: "GreaterThan: Syscall argument allowed", + desc: "arg allowed", data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x10, 0xffffffff}}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, }, { - desc: "GreaterThan: Syscall argument disallowed (equal)", + desc: "arg disallowed (first arg equal)", data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0xf, 0xffffffff}}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, }, { - desc: "Syscall argument disallowed (smaller)", + desc: "arg disallowed (first arg smaller)", data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x0, 0xffffffff}}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, }, { - desc: "GreaterThan2: Syscall argument allowed", - data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x10, 0xfbcd000d}}, + desc: "arg disallowed (second arg equal)", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x10, 0xabcd000d}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, + { + desc: "arg disallowed (second arg smaller)", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x10, 0xa000ffff}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, + }, + }, + { + name: "GreaterThanOrEqual", + ruleSets: []RuleSet{ + { + Rules: SyscallRules{ + 1: []Rule{ + { + // 4294967298 + // Both upper 32 bits and lower 32 bits are non-zero. + // 00000000000000000000000000000010 + // 00000000000000000000000000000010 + GreaterThanOrEqual(0x00000002_00000002), + }, + }, + }, + Action: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + }, + defaultAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + badArchAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD, + specs: []spec{ + { + desc: "high 32bits greater", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x00000003_00000002}}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, }, { - desc: "GreaterThan2: Syscall argument disallowed (equal)", - data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x10, 0xabcd000d}}, + desc: "high 32bits equal, low 32bits greater", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x00000002_00000003}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + { + desc: "high 32bits equal, low 32bits equal", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x00000002_00000002}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + { + desc: "high 32bits equal, low 32bits less", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x00000002_00000001}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, + { + desc: "high 32bits less", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x00000001_00000002}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, + }, + }, + { + name: "GreaterThanOrEqual (multi)", + ruleSets: []RuleSet{ + { + Rules: SyscallRules{ + 1: []Rule{ + { + GreaterThanOrEqual(0xf), + GreaterThanOrEqual(0xabcd000d), + }, + }, + }, + Action: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + }, + defaultAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + badArchAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD, + specs: []spec{ + { + desc: "arg allowed (both greater)", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x10, 0xffffffff}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + { + desc: "arg allowed (first arg equal)", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0xf, 0xffffffff}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + { + desc: "arg disallowed (first arg smaller)", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x0, 0xffffffff}}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, }, { - desc: "GreaterThan2: Syscall argument disallowed (smaller)", + desc: "arg allowed (second arg equal)", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x10, 0xabcd000d}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + { + desc: "arg disallowed (second arg smaller)", data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x10, 0xa000ffff}}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, }, + { + desc: "arg disallowed (both arg smaller)", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x0, 0xa000ffff}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, }, }, { + name: "LessThan", ruleSets: []RuleSet{ { Rules: SyscallRules{ 1: []Rule{ { - RuleIP: AllowValue(0x7aabbccdd), + // 4294967298 + // Both upper 32 bits and lower 32 bits are non-zero. + // 00000000000000000000000000000010 + // 00000000000000000000000000000010 + LessThan(0x00000002_00000002), }, }, }, @@ -402,40 +616,307 @@ func TestBasic(t *testing.T) { }, }, defaultAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + badArchAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD, specs: []spec{ { - desc: "IP: Syscall instruction pointer allowed", + desc: "high 32bits greater", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x00000003_00000002}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, + { + desc: "high 32bits equal, low 32bits greater", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x00000002_00000003}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, + { + desc: "high 32bits equal, low 32bits equal", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x00000002_00000002}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, + { + desc: "high 32bits equal, low 32bits less", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x00000002_00000001}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + { + desc: "high 32bits less", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x00000001_00000002}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + }, + }, + { + name: "LessThan (multi)", + ruleSets: []RuleSet{ + { + Rules: SyscallRules{ + 1: []Rule{ + { + LessThan(0x1), + LessThan(0xabcd000d), + }, + }, + }, + Action: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + }, + defaultAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + badArchAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD, + specs: []spec{ + { + desc: "arg allowed", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x0, 0x0}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + { + desc: "arg disallowed (first arg equal)", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x1, 0x0}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, + { + desc: "arg disallowed (first arg greater)", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x2, 0x0}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, + { + desc: "arg disallowed (second arg equal)", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x0, 0xabcd000d}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, + { + desc: "arg disallowed (second arg greater)", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x0, 0xffffffff}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, + { + desc: "arg disallowed (both arg greater)", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x2, 0xffffffff}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, + }, + }, + { + name: "LessThanOrEqual", + ruleSets: []RuleSet{ + { + Rules: SyscallRules{ + 1: []Rule{ + { + // 4294967298 + // Both upper 32 bits and lower 32 bits are non-zero. + // 00000000000000000000000000000010 + // 00000000000000000000000000000010 + LessThanOrEqual(0x00000002_00000002), + }, + }, + }, + Action: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + }, + defaultAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + badArchAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD, + specs: []spec{ + { + desc: "high 32bits greater", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x00000003_00000002}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, + { + desc: "high 32bits equal, low 32bits greater", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x00000002_00000003}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, + { + desc: "high 32bits equal, low 32bits equal", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x00000002_00000002}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + { + desc: "high 32bits equal, low 32bits less", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x00000002_00000001}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + { + desc: "high 32bits less", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x00000001_00000002}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + }, + }, + + { + name: "LessThanOrEqual (multi)", + ruleSets: []RuleSet{ + { + Rules: SyscallRules{ + 1: []Rule{ + { + LessThanOrEqual(0x1), + LessThanOrEqual(0xabcd000d), + }, + }, + }, + Action: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + }, + defaultAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + badArchAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD, + specs: []spec{ + { + desc: "arg allowed", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x0, 0x0}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + { + desc: "arg allowed (first arg equal)", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x1, 0x0}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + { + desc: "arg disallowed (first arg greater)", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x2, 0x0}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, + { + desc: "arg allowed (second arg equal)", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x0, 0xabcd000d}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + { + desc: "arg disallowed (second arg greater)", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x0, 0xffffffff}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, + { + desc: "arg disallowed (both arg greater)", + data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{0x2, 0xffffffff}}, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, + }, + }, + { + name: "MaskedEqual", + ruleSets: []RuleSet{ + { + Rules: SyscallRules{ + 1: []Rule{ + { + // x & 00000001 00000011 (0x103) == 00000000 00000001 (0x1) + // Input x must have lowest order bit set and + // must *not* have 8th or second lowest order bit set. + MaskedEqual(0x103, 0x1), + }, + }, + }, + Action: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + }, + defaultAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + badArchAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD, + specs: []spec{ + { + desc: "arg allowed (low order mandatory bit)", + data: seccompData{ + nr: 1, + arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, + // 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000001 + args: [6]uint64{0x1}, + }, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + { + desc: "arg allowed (low order optional bit)", + data: seccompData{ + nr: 1, + arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, + // 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000101 + args: [6]uint64{0x5}, + }, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + { + desc: "arg disallowed (lowest order bit not set)", + data: seccompData{ + nr: 1, + arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, + // 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000010 + args: [6]uint64{0x2}, + }, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, + { + desc: "arg disallowed (second lowest order bit set)", + data: seccompData{ + nr: 1, + arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, + // 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000011 + args: [6]uint64{0x3}, + }, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, + { + desc: "arg disallowed (8th bit set)", + data: seccompData{ + nr: 1, + arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, + // 00000000 00000000 00000001 00000000 + args: [6]uint64{0x100}, + }, + want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + }, + }, + }, + { + name: "Instruction Pointer", + ruleSets: []RuleSet{ + { + Rules: SyscallRules{ + 1: []Rule{ + { + RuleIP: EqualTo(0x7aabbccdd), + }, + }, + }, + Action: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, + }, + }, + defaultAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, + badArchAction: linux.SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD, + specs: []spec{ + { + desc: "allowed", data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{}, instructionPointer: 0x7aabbccdd}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, }, { - desc: "IP: Syscall instruction pointer disallowed", + desc: "disallowed", data: seccompData{nr: 1, arch: LINUX_AUDIT_ARCH, args: [6]uint64{}, instructionPointer: 0x711223344}, want: linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, }, }, }, } { - instrs, err := BuildProgram(test.ruleSets, test.defaultAction) - if err != nil { - t.Errorf("%s: buildProgram() got error: %v", test.specs[0].desc, err) - continue - } - p, err := bpf.Compile(instrs) - if err != nil { - t.Errorf("%s: bpf.Compile() got error: %v", test.specs[0].desc, err) - continue - } - for _, spec := range test.specs { - got, err := bpf.Exec(p, spec.data.asInput()) + t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) { + instrs, err := BuildProgram(test.ruleSets, test.defaultAction, test.badArchAction) if err != nil { - t.Errorf("%s: bpf.Exec() got error: %v", spec.desc, err) - continue + t.Fatalf("BuildProgram() got error: %v", err) + } + p, err := bpf.Compile(instrs) + if err != nil { + t.Fatalf("bpf.Compile() got error: %v", err) } - if got != uint32(spec.want) { - t.Errorf("%s: bpd.Exec() = %d, want: %d", spec.desc, got, spec.want) + for _, spec := range test.specs { + got, err := bpf.Exec(p, spec.data.asInput()) + if err != nil { + t.Fatalf("%s: bpf.Exec() got error: %v", spec.desc, err) + } + if got != uint32(spec.want) { + // Include a decoded version of the program in output for debugging purposes. + decoded, _ := bpf.DecodeInstructions(instrs) + t.Fatalf("%s: got: %d, want: %d\nBPF Program\n%s", spec.desc, got, spec.want, decoded) + } } - } + }) } } @@ -457,7 +938,7 @@ func TestRandom(t *testing.T) { Rules: syscallRules, Action: linux.SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, }, - }, linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP) + }, linux.SECCOMP_RET_TRAP, linux.SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("buildProgram() got error: %v", err) } diff --git a/pkg/seccomp/seccomp_test_victim.go b/pkg/seccomp/seccomp_test_victim.go index fe157f539..7f33e0d9e 100644 --- a/pkg/seccomp/seccomp_test_victim.go +++ b/pkg/seccomp/seccomp_test_victim.go @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ func main() { if !die { syscalls[syscall.SYS_OPENAT] = []seccomp.Rule{ { - seccomp.AllowValue(10), + seccomp.EqualTo(10), }, } } |