diff options
author | Ghanan Gowripalan <ghanan@google.com> | 2020-03-13 12:29:19 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | gVisor bot <gvisor-bot@google.com> | 2020-03-13 12:30:16 -0700 |
commit | 530a31f3c08b10fbd2f8135c5b76380cf5e7f4e8 (patch) | |
tree | ebdcb735ccd0805548535823aebcb9c2cf9b1fae /pkg/tcpip/stack/stack_test.go | |
parent | 86409c91813256f45ebcb08efeac9d7f9e56a804 (diff) |
Disable a NIC before removing it
When a NIC is removed, attempt to disable the NIC first to cleanup
dynamic state and stop ongoing periodic tasks (e.g. IPv6 router
solicitations, DAD) so that a removed NIC does not attempt to send
packets.
Tests:
- stack_test.TestRemoveUnknownNIC
- stack_test.TestRemoveNIC
- stack_test.TestDADStop
- stack_test.TestCleanupNDPState
- stack_test.TestRouteWithDownNIC
- stack_test.TestStopStartSolicitingRouters
PiperOrigin-RevId: 300805857
Diffstat (limited to 'pkg/tcpip/stack/stack_test.go')
-rw-r--r-- | pkg/tcpip/stack/stack_test.go | 408 |
1 files changed, 248 insertions, 160 deletions
diff --git a/pkg/tcpip/stack/stack_test.go b/pkg/tcpip/stack/stack_test.go index 9515426d6..9836b340f 100644 --- a/pkg/tcpip/stack/stack_test.go +++ b/pkg/tcpip/stack/stack_test.go @@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ type linkEPWithMockedAttach struct { // Attach implements stack.LinkEndpoint.Attach. func (l *linkEPWithMockedAttach) Attach(d stack.NetworkDispatcher) { l.LinkEndpoint.Attach(d) - l.attached = true + l.attached = d != nil } func (l *linkEPWithMockedAttach) isAttached() bool { @@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ func TestAttachToLinkEndpointImmediately(t *testing.T) { t.Fatalf("CreateNICWithOptions(%d, _, %+v) = %s", nicID, test.nicOpts, err) } if !e.isAttached() { - t.Fatalf("link endpoint not attached to a network disatcher") + t.Fatal("link endpoint not attached to a network dispatcher") } }) } @@ -631,196 +631,240 @@ func TestDisabledNICsNICInfoAndCheckNIC(t *testing.T) { checkNIC(false) } -func TestRoutesWithDisabledNIC(t *testing.T) { - const unspecifiedNIC = 0 - const nicID1 = 1 - const nicID2 = 2 - +func TestRemoveUnknownNIC(t *testing.T) { s := stack.New(stack.Options{ NetworkProtocols: []stack.NetworkProtocol{fakeNetFactory()}, }) - ep1 := channel.New(0, defaultMTU, "") - if err := s.CreateNIC(nicID1, ep1); err != nil { - t.Fatalf("CreateNIC(%d, _): %s", nicID1, err) + if err := s.RemoveNIC(1); err != tcpip.ErrUnknownNICID { + t.Fatalf("got s.RemoveNIC(1) = %v, want = %s", err, tcpip.ErrUnknownNICID) } +} - addr1 := tcpip.Address("\x01") - if err := s.AddAddress(nicID1, fakeNetNumber, addr1); err != nil { - t.Fatalf("AddAddress(%d, %d, %s): %s", nicID1, fakeNetNumber, addr1, err) - } +func TestRemoveNIC(t *testing.T) { + const nicID = 1 + + s := stack.New(stack.Options{ + NetworkProtocols: []stack.NetworkProtocol{fakeNetFactory()}, + }) - ep2 := channel.New(0, defaultMTU, "") - if err := s.CreateNIC(nicID2, ep2); err != nil { - t.Fatalf("CreateNIC(%d, _): %s", nicID2, err) + e := linkEPWithMockedAttach{ + LinkEndpoint: loopback.New(), + } + if err := s.CreateNIC(nicID, &e); err != nil { + t.Fatalf("CreateNIC(%d, _) = %s", nicID, err) } - addr2 := tcpip.Address("\x02") - if err := s.AddAddress(nicID2, fakeNetNumber, addr2); err != nil { - t.Fatalf("AddAddress(%d, %d, %s): %s", nicID2, fakeNetNumber, addr2, err) + // NIC should be present in NICInfo and attached to a NetworkDispatcher. + allNICInfo := s.NICInfo() + if _, ok := allNICInfo[nicID]; !ok { + t.Errorf("entry for %d missing from allNICInfo = %+v", nicID, allNICInfo) + } + if !e.isAttached() { + t.Fatal("link endpoint not attached to a network dispatcher") } - // Set a route table that sends all packets with odd destination - // addresses through the first NIC, and all even destination address - // through the second one. - { - subnet0, err := tcpip.NewSubnet("\x00", "\x01") - if err != nil { - t.Fatal(err) - } - subnet1, err := tcpip.NewSubnet("\x01", "\x01") - if err != nil { - t.Fatal(err) - } - s.SetRouteTable([]tcpip.Route{ - {Destination: subnet1, Gateway: "\x00", NIC: nicID1}, - {Destination: subnet0, Gateway: "\x00", NIC: nicID2}, - }) + // Removing a NIC should remove it from NICInfo and e should be detached from + // the NetworkDispatcher. + if err := s.RemoveNIC(nicID); err != nil { + t.Fatalf("s.RemoveNIC(%d): %s", nicID, err) } + if nicInfo, ok := s.NICInfo()[nicID]; ok { + t.Errorf("got unexpected NICInfo entry for deleted NIC %d = %+v", nicID, nicInfo) + } + if e.isAttached() { + t.Error("link endpoint for removed NIC still attached to a network dispatcher") + } +} - // Test routes to odd address. - testRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, "", "\x05", addr1) - testRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, addr1, "\x05", addr1) - testRoute(t, s, nicID1, addr1, "\x05", addr1) +func TestRouteWithDownNIC(t *testing.T) { + tests := []struct { + name string + downFn func(s *stack.Stack, nicID tcpip.NICID) *tcpip.Error + upFn func(s *stack.Stack, nicID tcpip.NICID) *tcpip.Error + }{ + { + name: "Disabled NIC", + downFn: (*stack.Stack).DisableNIC, + upFn: (*stack.Stack).EnableNIC, + }, + + // Once a NIC is removed, it cannot be brought up. + { + name: "Removed NIC", + downFn: (*stack.Stack).RemoveNIC, + }, + } - // Test routes to even address. - testRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, "", "\x06", addr2) - testRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, addr2, "\x06", addr2) - testRoute(t, s, nicID2, addr2, "\x06", addr2) - - // Disabling NIC1 should result in no routes to odd addresses. Routes to even - // addresses should continue to be available as NIC2 is still enabled. - if err := s.DisableNIC(nicID1); err != nil { - t.Fatalf("s.DisableNIC(%d): %s", nicID1, err) - } - nic1Dst := tcpip.Address("\x05") - testNoRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, "", nic1Dst) - testNoRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, addr1, nic1Dst) - testNoRoute(t, s, nicID1, addr1, nic1Dst) - nic2Dst := tcpip.Address("\x06") - testRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, "", nic2Dst, addr2) - testRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, addr2, nic2Dst, addr2) - testRoute(t, s, nicID2, addr2, nic2Dst, addr2) - - // Disabling NIC2 should result in no routes to even addresses. No route - // should be available to any address as routes to odd addresses were made - // unavailable by disabling NIC1 above. - if err := s.DisableNIC(nicID2); err != nil { - t.Fatalf("s.DisableNIC(%d): %s", nicID2, err) - } - testNoRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, "", nic1Dst) - testNoRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, addr1, nic1Dst) - testNoRoute(t, s, nicID1, addr1, nic1Dst) - testNoRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, "", nic2Dst) - testNoRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, addr2, nic2Dst) - testNoRoute(t, s, nicID2, addr2, nic2Dst) - - // Enabling NIC1 should make routes to odd addresses available again. Routes - // to even addresses should continue to be unavailable as NIC2 is still - // disabled. - if err := s.EnableNIC(nicID1); err != nil { - t.Fatalf("s.EnableNIC(%d): %s", nicID1, err) - } - testRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, "", nic1Dst, addr1) - testRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, addr1, nic1Dst, addr1) - testRoute(t, s, nicID1, addr1, nic1Dst, addr1) - testNoRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, "", nic2Dst) - testNoRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, addr2, nic2Dst) - testNoRoute(t, s, nicID2, addr2, nic2Dst) -} - -func TestRouteWritePacketWithDisabledNIC(t *testing.T) { const unspecifiedNIC = 0 const nicID1 = 1 const nicID2 = 2 + const addr1 = tcpip.Address("\x01") + const addr2 = tcpip.Address("\x02") + const nic1Dst = tcpip.Address("\x05") + const nic2Dst = tcpip.Address("\x06") + + setup := func(t *testing.T) (*stack.Stack, *channel.Endpoint, *channel.Endpoint) { + s := stack.New(stack.Options{ + NetworkProtocols: []stack.NetworkProtocol{fakeNetFactory()}, + }) - s := stack.New(stack.Options{ - NetworkProtocols: []stack.NetworkProtocol{fakeNetFactory()}, - }) + ep1 := channel.New(1, defaultMTU, "") + if err := s.CreateNIC(nicID1, ep1); err != nil { + t.Fatalf("CreateNIC(%d, _): %s", nicID1, err) + } - ep1 := channel.New(1, defaultMTU, "") - if err := s.CreateNIC(nicID1, ep1); err != nil { - t.Fatalf("CreateNIC(%d, _): %s", nicID1, err) - } + if err := s.AddAddress(nicID1, fakeNetNumber, addr1); err != nil { + t.Fatalf("AddAddress(%d, %d, %s): %s", nicID1, fakeNetNumber, addr1, err) + } - addr1 := tcpip.Address("\x01") - if err := s.AddAddress(nicID1, fakeNetNumber, addr1); err != nil { - t.Fatalf("AddAddress(%d, %d, %s): %s", nicID1, fakeNetNumber, addr1, err) - } + ep2 := channel.New(1, defaultMTU, "") + if err := s.CreateNIC(nicID2, ep2); err != nil { + t.Fatalf("CreateNIC(%d, _): %s", nicID2, err) + } - ep2 := channel.New(1, defaultMTU, "") - if err := s.CreateNIC(nicID2, ep2); err != nil { - t.Fatalf("CreateNIC(%d, _): %s", nicID2, err) - } + if err := s.AddAddress(nicID2, fakeNetNumber, addr2); err != nil { + t.Fatalf("AddAddress(%d, %d, %s): %s", nicID2, fakeNetNumber, addr2, err) + } - addr2 := tcpip.Address("\x02") - if err := s.AddAddress(nicID2, fakeNetNumber, addr2); err != nil { - t.Fatalf("AddAddress(%d, %d, %s): %s", nicID2, fakeNetNumber, addr2, err) + // Set a route table that sends all packets with odd destination + // addresses through the first NIC, and all even destination address + // through the second one. + { + subnet0, err := tcpip.NewSubnet("\x00", "\x01") + if err != nil { + t.Fatal(err) + } + subnet1, err := tcpip.NewSubnet("\x01", "\x01") + if err != nil { + t.Fatal(err) + } + s.SetRouteTable([]tcpip.Route{ + {Destination: subnet1, Gateway: "\x00", NIC: nicID1}, + {Destination: subnet0, Gateway: "\x00", NIC: nicID2}, + }) + } + + return s, ep1, ep2 } - // Set a route table that sends all packets with odd destination - // addresses through the first NIC, and all even destination address - // through the second one. - { - subnet0, err := tcpip.NewSubnet("\x00", "\x01") - if err != nil { - t.Fatal(err) - } - subnet1, err := tcpip.NewSubnet("\x01", "\x01") - if err != nil { - t.Fatal(err) + // Tests that routes through a down NIC are not used when looking up a route + // for a destination. + t.Run("Find", func(t *testing.T) { + for _, test := range tests { + t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) { + s, _, _ := setup(t) + + // Test routes to odd address. + testRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, "", "\x05", addr1) + testRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, addr1, "\x05", addr1) + testRoute(t, s, nicID1, addr1, "\x05", addr1) + + // Test routes to even address. + testRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, "", "\x06", addr2) + testRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, addr2, "\x06", addr2) + testRoute(t, s, nicID2, addr2, "\x06", addr2) + + // Bringing NIC1 down should result in no routes to odd addresses. Routes to + // even addresses should continue to be available as NIC2 is still up. + if err := test.downFn(s, nicID1); err != nil { + t.Fatalf("test.downFn(_, %d): %s", nicID1, err) + } + testNoRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, "", nic1Dst) + testNoRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, addr1, nic1Dst) + testNoRoute(t, s, nicID1, addr1, nic1Dst) + testRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, "", nic2Dst, addr2) + testRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, addr2, nic2Dst, addr2) + testRoute(t, s, nicID2, addr2, nic2Dst, addr2) + + // Bringing NIC2 down should result in no routes to even addresses. No + // route should be available to any address as routes to odd addresses + // were made unavailable by bringing NIC1 down above. + if err := test.downFn(s, nicID2); err != nil { + t.Fatalf("test.downFn(_, %d): %s", nicID2, err) + } + testNoRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, "", nic1Dst) + testNoRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, addr1, nic1Dst) + testNoRoute(t, s, nicID1, addr1, nic1Dst) + testNoRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, "", nic2Dst) + testNoRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, addr2, nic2Dst) + testNoRoute(t, s, nicID2, addr2, nic2Dst) + + if upFn := test.upFn; upFn != nil { + // Bringing NIC1 up should make routes to odd addresses available + // again. Routes to even addresses should continue to be unavailable + // as NIC2 is still down. + if err := upFn(s, nicID1); err != nil { + t.Fatalf("test.upFn(_, %d): %s", nicID1, err) + } + testRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, "", nic1Dst, addr1) + testRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, addr1, nic1Dst, addr1) + testRoute(t, s, nicID1, addr1, nic1Dst, addr1) + testNoRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, "", nic2Dst) + testNoRoute(t, s, unspecifiedNIC, addr2, nic2Dst) + testNoRoute(t, s, nicID2, addr2, nic2Dst) + } + }) } - s.SetRouteTable([]tcpip.Route{ - {Destination: subnet1, Gateway: "\x00", NIC: nicID1}, - {Destination: subnet0, Gateway: "\x00", NIC: nicID2}, - }) - } + }) - nic1Dst := tcpip.Address("\x05") - r1, err := s.FindRoute(nicID1, addr1, nic1Dst, fakeNetNumber, false /* multicastLoop */) - if err != nil { - t.Errorf("FindRoute(%d, %s, %s, %d, false): %s", nicID1, addr1, nic1Dst, fakeNetNumber, err) - } - defer r1.Release() + // Tests that writing a packet using a Route through a down NIC fails. + t.Run("WritePacket", func(t *testing.T) { + for _, test := range tests { + t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) { + s, ep1, ep2 := setup(t) - nic2Dst := tcpip.Address("\x06") - r2, err := s.FindRoute(nicID2, addr2, nic2Dst, fakeNetNumber, false /* multicastLoop */) - if err != nil { - t.Errorf("FindRoute(%d, %s, %s, %d, false): %s", nicID2, addr2, nic2Dst, fakeNetNumber, err) - } - defer r2.Release() + r1, err := s.FindRoute(nicID1, addr1, nic1Dst, fakeNetNumber, false /* multicastLoop */) + if err != nil { + t.Errorf("FindRoute(%d, %s, %s, %d, false): %s", nicID1, addr1, nic1Dst, fakeNetNumber, err) + } + defer r1.Release() - // If we failed to get routes r1 or r2, we cannot proceed with the test. - if t.Failed() { - t.FailNow() - } + r2, err := s.FindRoute(nicID2, addr2, nic2Dst, fakeNetNumber, false /* multicastLoop */) + if err != nil { + t.Errorf("FindRoute(%d, %s, %s, %d, false): %s", nicID2, addr2, nic2Dst, fakeNetNumber, err) + } + defer r2.Release() - buf := buffer.View([]byte{1}) - testSend(t, r1, ep1, buf) - testSend(t, r2, ep2, buf) + // If we failed to get routes r1 or r2, we cannot proceed with the test. + if t.Failed() { + t.FailNow() + } - // Writes with Routes that use the disabled NIC1 should fail. - if err := s.DisableNIC(nicID1); err != nil { - t.Fatalf("s.DisableNIC(%d): %s", nicID1, err) - } - testFailingSend(t, r1, ep1, buf, tcpip.ErrInvalidEndpointState) - testSend(t, r2, ep2, buf) + buf := buffer.View([]byte{1}) + testSend(t, r1, ep1, buf) + testSend(t, r2, ep2, buf) - // Writes with Routes that use the disabled NIC2 should fail. - if err := s.DisableNIC(nicID2); err != nil { - t.Fatalf("s.DisableNIC(%d): %s", nicID2, err) - } - testFailingSend(t, r1, ep1, buf, tcpip.ErrInvalidEndpointState) - testFailingSend(t, r2, ep2, buf, tcpip.ErrInvalidEndpointState) + // Writes with Routes that use NIC1 after being brought down should fail. + if err := test.downFn(s, nicID1); err != nil { + t.Fatalf("test.downFn(_, %d): %s", nicID1, err) + } + testFailingSend(t, r1, ep1, buf, tcpip.ErrInvalidEndpointState) + testSend(t, r2, ep2, buf) - // Writes with Routes that use the re-enabled NIC1 should succeed. - // TODO(b/147015577): Should we instead completely invalidate all Routes that - // were bound to a disabled NIC at some point? - if err := s.EnableNIC(nicID1); err != nil { - t.Fatalf("s.EnableNIC(%d): %s", nicID1, err) - } - testSend(t, r1, ep1, buf) - testFailingSend(t, r2, ep2, buf, tcpip.ErrInvalidEndpointState) + // Writes with Routes that use NIC2 after being brought down should fail. + if err := test.downFn(s, nicID2); err != nil { + t.Fatalf("test.downFn(_, %d): %s", nicID2, err) + } + testFailingSend(t, r1, ep1, buf, tcpip.ErrInvalidEndpointState) + testFailingSend(t, r2, ep2, buf, tcpip.ErrInvalidEndpointState) + + if upFn := test.upFn; upFn != nil { + // Writes with Routes that use NIC1 after being brought up should + // succeed. + // + // TODO(b/147015577): Should we instead completely invalidate all + // Routes that were bound to a NIC that was brought down at some + // point? + if err := upFn(s, nicID1); err != nil { + t.Fatalf("test.upFn(_, %d): %s", nicID1, err) + } + testSend(t, r1, ep1, buf) + testFailingSend(t, r2, ep2, buf, tcpip.ErrInvalidEndpointState) + } + }) + } + }) } func TestRoutes(t *testing.T) { @@ -3038,6 +3082,50 @@ func TestAddRemoveIPv4BroadcastAddressOnNICEnableDisable(t *testing.T) { } } +// TestLeaveIPv6SolicitedNodeAddrBeforeAddrRemoval tests that removing an IPv6 +// address after leaving its solicited node multicast address does not result in +// an error. +func TestLeaveIPv6SolicitedNodeAddrBeforeAddrRemoval(t *testing.T) { + const nicID = 1 + + s := stack.New(stack.Options{ + NetworkProtocols: []stack.NetworkProtocol{ipv6.NewProtocol()}, + }) + e := channel.New(10, 1280, linkAddr1) + if err := s.CreateNIC(1, e); err != nil { + t.Fatalf("CreateNIC(%d, _): %s", nicID, err) + } + + if err := s.AddAddress(nicID, ipv6.ProtocolNumber, addr1); err != nil { + t.Fatalf("AddAddress(%d, %d, %s): %s", nicID, ipv6.ProtocolNumber, addr1, err) + } + + // The NIC should have joined addr1's solicited node multicast address. + snmc := header.SolicitedNodeAddr(addr1) + in, err := s.IsInGroup(nicID, snmc) + if err != nil { + t.Fatalf("IsInGroup(%d, %s): %s", nicID, snmc, err) + } + if !in { + t.Fatalf("got IsInGroup(%d, %s) = false, want = true", nicID, snmc) + } + + if err := s.LeaveGroup(ipv6.ProtocolNumber, nicID, snmc); err != nil { + t.Fatalf("LeaveGroup(%d, %d, %s): %s", ipv6.ProtocolNumber, nicID, snmc, err) + } + in, err = s.IsInGroup(nicID, snmc) + if err != nil { + t.Fatalf("IsInGroup(%d, %s): %s", nicID, snmc, err) + } + if in { + t.Fatalf("got IsInGroup(%d, %s) = true, want = false", nicID, snmc) + } + + if err := s.RemoveAddress(nicID, addr1); err != nil { + t.Fatalf("RemoveAddress(%d, %s) = %s", nicID, addr1, err) + } +} + func TestJoinLeaveAllNodesMulticastOnNICEnableDisable(t *testing.T) { const nicID = 1 |