diff options
author | Kevin Krakauer <krakauer@google.com> | 2020-02-07 11:21:07 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Kevin Krakauer <krakauer@google.com> | 2020-02-12 15:02:47 -0800 |
commit | 6fdf2c53a1d084b70602170b660242036fd8fe4f (patch) | |
tree | d9de9c93d474529c7fb71d07f143545c860c3836 /pkg/tcpip/iptables | |
parent | 0dd9ee0d1e08d4207f78ab032a5fde171343c4b4 (diff) |
iptables: User chains
- Adds creation of user chains via `-N <chainname>`
- Adds `-j RETURN` support for built-in chains, which triggers the
chain's underflow rule (usually the default policy).
- Adds tests for chain creation, default policies, and `-j RETURN' from
built-in chains.
Diffstat (limited to 'pkg/tcpip/iptables')
-rw-r--r-- | pkg/tcpip/iptables/iptables.go | 74 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | pkg/tcpip/iptables/targets.go | 41 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | pkg/tcpip/iptables/types.go | 50 |
3 files changed, 96 insertions, 69 deletions
diff --git a/pkg/tcpip/iptables/iptables.go b/pkg/tcpip/iptables/iptables.go index 1b9485bbd..75a433a3b 100644 --- a/pkg/tcpip/iptables/iptables.go +++ b/pkg/tcpip/iptables/iptables.go @@ -52,10 +52,10 @@ func DefaultTables() IPTables { Tables: map[string]Table{ TablenameNat: Table{ Rules: []Rule{ - Rule{Target: UnconditionalAcceptTarget{}}, - Rule{Target: UnconditionalAcceptTarget{}}, - Rule{Target: UnconditionalAcceptTarget{}}, - Rule{Target: UnconditionalAcceptTarget{}}, + Rule{Target: AcceptTarget{}}, + Rule{Target: AcceptTarget{}}, + Rule{Target: AcceptTarget{}}, + Rule{Target: AcceptTarget{}}, Rule{Target: ErrorTarget{}}, }, BuiltinChains: map[Hook]int{ @@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ func DefaultTables() IPTables { }, TablenameMangle: Table{ Rules: []Rule{ - Rule{Target: UnconditionalAcceptTarget{}}, - Rule{Target: UnconditionalAcceptTarget{}}, + Rule{Target: AcceptTarget{}}, + Rule{Target: AcceptTarget{}}, Rule{Target: ErrorTarget{}}, }, BuiltinChains: map[Hook]int{ @@ -90,9 +90,9 @@ func DefaultTables() IPTables { }, TablenameFilter: Table{ Rules: []Rule{ - Rule{Target: UnconditionalAcceptTarget{}}, - Rule{Target: UnconditionalAcceptTarget{}}, - Rule{Target: UnconditionalAcceptTarget{}}, + Rule{Target: AcceptTarget{}}, + Rule{Target: AcceptTarget{}}, + Rule{Target: AcceptTarget{}}, Rule{Target: ErrorTarget{}}, }, BuiltinChains: map[Hook]int{ @@ -149,13 +149,11 @@ func (it *IPTables) Check(hook Hook, pkt tcpip.PacketBuffer) bool { for _, tablename := range it.Priorities[hook] { switch verdict := it.checkTable(hook, pkt, tablename); verdict { // If the table returns Accept, move on to the next table. - case Accept: + case TableAccept: continue // The Drop verdict is final. - case Drop: + case TableDrop: return false - case Stolen, Queue, Repeat, None, Jump, Return, Continue: - panic(fmt.Sprintf("Unimplemented verdict %v.", verdict)) default: panic(fmt.Sprintf("Unknown verdict %v.", verdict)) } @@ -166,36 +164,58 @@ func (it *IPTables) Check(hook Hook, pkt tcpip.PacketBuffer) bool { } // Precondition: pkt.NetworkHeader is set. -func (it *IPTables) checkTable(hook Hook, pkt tcpip.PacketBuffer, tablename string) Verdict { +func (it *IPTables) checkTable(hook Hook, pkt tcpip.PacketBuffer, tablename string) TableVerdict { // Start from ruleIdx and walk the list of rules until a rule gives us // a verdict. table := it.Tables[tablename] for ruleIdx := table.BuiltinChains[hook]; ruleIdx < len(table.Rules); ruleIdx++ { switch verdict := it.checkRule(hook, pkt, table, ruleIdx); verdict { - // In either of these cases, this table is done with the packet. - case Accept, Drop: - return verdict - // Continue traversing the rules of the table. - case Continue: + case RuleAccept: + return TableAccept + + case RuleDrop: + return TableDrop + + case RuleContinue: continue - case Stolen, Queue, Repeat, None, Jump, Return: - panic(fmt.Sprintf("Unimplemented verdict %v.", verdict)) + + case RuleReturn: + // TODO(gvisor.dev/issue/170): We don't implement jump + // yet, so any Return is from a built-in chain. That + // means we have to to call the underflow. + underflow := table.Rules[table.Underflows[hook]] + // Underflow is guaranteed to be an unconditional + // ACCEPT or DROP. + switch v, _ := underflow.Target.Action(pkt); v { + case RuleAccept: + return TableAccept + case RuleDrop: + return TableDrop + case RuleContinue, RuleReturn: + panic("Underflows should only return RuleAccept or RuleDrop.") + default: + panic(fmt.Sprintf("Unknown verdict: %d", v)) + } + default: - panic(fmt.Sprintf("Unknown verdict %v.", verdict)) + panic(fmt.Sprintf("Unknown verdict: %d", verdict)) } + } - panic(fmt.Sprintf("Traversed past the entire list of iptables rules in table %q.", tablename)) + // We got through the entire table without a decision. Default to DROP + // for safety. + return TableDrop } // Precondition: pk.NetworkHeader is set. -func (it *IPTables) checkRule(hook Hook, pkt tcpip.PacketBuffer, table Table, ruleIdx int) Verdict { +func (it *IPTables) checkRule(hook Hook, pkt tcpip.PacketBuffer, table Table, ruleIdx int) RuleVerdict { rule := table.Rules[ruleIdx] // First check whether the packet matches the IP header filter. // TODO(gvisor.dev/issue/170): Support other fields of the filter. if rule.Filter.Protocol != 0 && rule.Filter.Protocol != header.IPv4(pkt.NetworkHeader).TransportProtocol() { - return Continue + return RuleContinue } // Go through each rule matcher. If they all match, run @@ -203,10 +223,10 @@ func (it *IPTables) checkRule(hook Hook, pkt tcpip.PacketBuffer, table Table, ru for _, matcher := range rule.Matchers { matches, hotdrop := matcher.Match(hook, pkt, "") if hotdrop { - return Drop + return RuleDrop } if !matches { - return Continue + return RuleContinue } } diff --git a/pkg/tcpip/iptables/targets.go b/pkg/tcpip/iptables/targets.go index 4dd281371..9fc60cfad 100644 --- a/pkg/tcpip/iptables/targets.go +++ b/pkg/tcpip/iptables/targets.go @@ -21,20 +21,20 @@ import ( "gvisor.dev/gvisor/pkg/tcpip" ) -// UnconditionalAcceptTarget accepts all packets. -type UnconditionalAcceptTarget struct{} +// AcceptTarget accepts packets. +type AcceptTarget struct{} // Action implements Target.Action. -func (UnconditionalAcceptTarget) Action(packet tcpip.PacketBuffer) (Verdict, string) { - return Accept, "" +func (AcceptTarget) Action(packet tcpip.PacketBuffer) (RuleVerdict, string) { + return RuleAccept, "" } -// UnconditionalDropTarget denies all packets. -type UnconditionalDropTarget struct{} +// DropTarget drops packets. +type DropTarget struct{} // Action implements Target.Action. -func (UnconditionalDropTarget) Action(packet tcpip.PacketBuffer) (Verdict, string) { - return Drop, "" +func (DropTarget) Action(packet tcpip.PacketBuffer) (RuleVerdict, string) { + return RuleDrop, "" } // ErrorTarget logs an error and drops the packet. It represents a target that @@ -42,7 +42,26 @@ func (UnconditionalDropTarget) Action(packet tcpip.PacketBuffer) (Verdict, strin type ErrorTarget struct{} // Action implements Target.Action. -func (ErrorTarget) Action(packet tcpip.PacketBuffer) (Verdict, string) { - log.Warningf("ErrorTarget triggered.") - return Drop, "" +func (ErrorTarget) Action(packet tcpip.PacketBuffer) (RuleVerdict, string) { + log.Debugf("ErrorTarget triggered.") + return RuleDrop, "" +} + +// UserChainTarget marks a rule as the beginning of a user chain. +type UserChainTarget struct { + Name string +} + +// Action implements Target.Action. +func (UserChainTarget) Action(tcpip.PacketBuffer) (RuleVerdict, string) { + panic("UserChainTarget should never be called.") +} + +// ReturnTarget returns from the current chain. If the chain is a built-in, the +// hook's underflow should be called. +type ReturnTarget struct{} + +// Action implements Target.Action. +func (ReturnTarget) Action(tcpip.PacketBuffer) (RuleVerdict, string) { + return RuleReturn, "" } diff --git a/pkg/tcpip/iptables/types.go b/pkg/tcpip/iptables/types.go index 7d593c35c..5735d001b 100644 --- a/pkg/tcpip/iptables/types.go +++ b/pkg/tcpip/iptables/types.go @@ -56,44 +56,32 @@ const ( NumHooks ) -// A Verdict is returned by a rule's target to indicate how traversal of rules -// should (or should not) continue. -type Verdict int +// A TableVerdict is what a table decides should be done with a packet. +type TableVerdict int const ( - // Invalid indicates an unkonwn or erroneous verdict. - Invalid Verdict = iota + // TableAccept indicates the packet should continue through netstack. + TableAccept TableVerdict = iota - // Accept indicates the packet should continue traversing netstack as - // normal. - Accept - - // Drop inicates the packet should be dropped, stopping traversing - // netstack. - Drop - - // Stolen indicates the packet was co-opted by the target and should - // stop traversing netstack. - Stolen - - // Queue indicates the packet should be queued for userspace processing. - Queue + // TableAccept indicates the packet should be dropped. + TableDrop +) - // Repeat indicates the packet should re-traverse the chains for the - // current hook. - Repeat +// A RuleVerdict is what a rule decides should be done with a packet. +type RuleVerdict int - // None indicates no verdict was reached. - None +const ( + // RuleAccept indicates the packet should continue through netstack. + RuleAccept RuleVerdict = iota - // Jump indicates a jump to another chain. - Jump + // RuleContinue indicates the packet should continue to the next rule. + RuleContinue - // Continue indicates that traversal should continue at the next rule. - Continue + // RuleDrop indicates the packet should be dropped. + RuleDrop - // Return indicates that traversal should return to the calling chain. - Return + // RuleReturn indicates the packet should return to the previous chain. + RuleReturn ) // IPTables holds all the tables for a netstack. @@ -187,5 +175,5 @@ type Target interface { // Action takes an action on the packet and returns a verdict on how // traversal should (or should not) continue. If the return value is // Jump, it also returns the name of the chain to jump to. - Action(packet tcpip.PacketBuffer) (Verdict, string) + Action(packet tcpip.PacketBuffer) (RuleVerdict, string) } |