diff options
author | Ayush Ranjan <ayushranjan@google.com> | 2019-08-09 13:07:06 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | gVisor bot <gvisor-bot@google.com> | 2019-08-09 13:08:28 -0700 |
commit | c8961a6cbde04603398d1db92b8a26147453f3a7 (patch) | |
tree | b8b123eb0ae88303d8d3c902b067e450ed4273f9 /pkg/sentry/fsimpl/ext/README.md | |
parent | 690308111cc3b7332b2c06db19b87db0236aff1e (diff) |
ext: Move to pkg/sentry/fsimpl.
fsimpl is the keeper of all filesystem implementations in VFS2.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 262617869
Diffstat (limited to 'pkg/sentry/fsimpl/ext/README.md')
-rw-r--r-- | pkg/sentry/fsimpl/ext/README.md | 117 |
1 files changed, 117 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/pkg/sentry/fsimpl/ext/README.md b/pkg/sentry/fsimpl/ext/README.md new file mode 100644 index 000000000..af00cfda8 --- /dev/null +++ b/pkg/sentry/fsimpl/ext/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@ +## EXT(2/3/4) File System + +This is a filesystem driver which supports ext2, ext3 and ext4 filesystems. +Linux has specialized drivers for each variant but none which supports all. This +library takes advantage of ext's backward compatibility and understands the +internal organization of on-disk structures to support all variants. + +This driver implementation diverges from the Linux implementations in being more +forgiving about versioning. For instance, if a filesystem contains both extent +based inodes and classical block map based inodes, this driver will not complain +and interpret them both correctly. While in Linux this would be an issue. This +blurs the line between the three ext fs variants. + +Ext2 is considered deprecated as of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7, and ext3 has +been superseded by ext4 by large performance gains. Thus it is recommended to +upgrade older filesystem images to ext4 using e2fsprogs for better performance. + +### Read Only + +This driver currently only allows read only operations. A lot of the design +decisions are based on this feature. There are plans to implement write (the +process for which is documented in the future work section). + +### Performance + +One of the biggest wins about this driver is that it directly talks to the +underlying block device (or whatever persistent storage is being used), instead +of making expensive RPCs to a gofer. + +Another advantage is that ext fs supports fast concurrent reads. Currently the +device is represented using a `io.ReaderAt` which allows for concurrent reads. +All reads are directly passed to the device driver which intelligently serves +the read requests in the optimal order. There is no congestion due to locking +while reading in the filesystem level. + +Reads are optimized further in the way file data is transferred over to user +memory. Ext fs directly copies over file data from disk into user memory with no +additional allocations on the way. We can only get faster by preloading file +data into memory (see future work section). + +The internal structures used to represent files, inodes and file descriptors use +a lot of inheritance. With the level of indirection that an interface adds with +an internal pointer, it can quickly fragment a structure across memory. As this +runs along side a full blown kernel (which is memory intensive), having a +fragmented struct might hurt performance. Hence these internal structures, +though interfaced, are tightly packed in memory using the same inheritance +pattern that pkg/sentry/vfs uses. The pkg/sentry/fsimpl/ext/disklayout package +makes an execption to this pattern for reasons documented in the package. + +### Security + +This driver also intends to help sandbox the container better by reducing the +surface of the host kernel that the application touches. It prevents the +application from exploiting vulnerabilities in the host filesystem driver. All +`io.ReaderAt.ReadAt()` calls are translated to `pread(2)` which are directly +passed to the device driver in the kernel. Hence this reduces the surface for +attack. + +The application can not affect any host filesystems other than the one passed +via block device by the user. + +### Future Work + +#### Write + +To support write operations we would need to modify the block device underneath. +Currently, the driver does not modify the device at all, not even for updating +the access times for reads. Modifying the filesystem incorrectly can corrupt it +and render it unreadable for other correct ext(x) drivers. Hence caution must be +maintained while modifying metadata structures. + +Ext4 specifically is built for performance and has added a lot of complexity as +to how metadata structures are modified. For instance, files that are organized +via an extent tree which must be balanced and file data blocks must be placed in +the same extent as much as possible to increase locality. Such properties must +be maintained while modifying the tree. + +Ext filesystems boast a lot about locality, which plays a big role in them being +performant. The block allocation algorithm in Linux does a good job in keeping +related data together. This behavior must be maintained as much as possible, +else we might end up degrading the filesystem performance over time. + +Ext4 also supports a wide variety of features which are specialized for varying +use cases. Implementing all of them can get difficult very quickly. + +Ext(x) checksums all its metadata structures to check for corruption, so +modification of any metadata struct must correspond with re-checksumming the +struct. Linux filesystem drivers also order on-disk updates intelligently to not +corrupt the filesystem and also remain performant. The in-memory metadata +structures must be kept in sync with what is on disk. + +There is also replication of some important structures across the filesystem. +All replicas must be updated when their original copy is updated. There is also +provisioning for snapshotting which must be kept in mind, although it should not +affect this implementation unless we allow users to create filesystem snapshots. + +Ext4 also introduced journaling (jbd2). The journal must be updated +appropriately. + +#### Performance + +To improve performance we should implement a buffer cache, and optionally, read +ahead for small files. While doing so we must also keep in mind the memory usage +and have a reasonable cap on how much file data we want to hold in memory. + +#### Features + +Our current implementation will work with most ext4 filesystems for readonly +purposed. However, the following features are not supported yet: + +- Journal +- Snapshotting +- Extended Attributes +- Hash Tree Directories +- Meta Block Groups +- Multiple Mount Protection +- Bigalloc |