Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
This reverts commit 74c0527dda13032dabd5dd4b7034115827fd2a46.
Fix this in a different way.
|
|
We want to check out if two pointers are same or different here. Make
the code clear.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
The current code uses Path.Equal(), which just check out if pathes are
idential. However, it doesn't work for two cloned pathes of a path
(soft update in case).
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
from configuration file
[policy-definitions.statements.actions.bgp-actions]
set-next-hop = "self"
from cli
$ gobgp policy statement stmt1 add action next-hop self
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
The order of the flowspec routes matters because they will be used
as ACL rules and what rule will be applied depends on the order.
RFC5575 specifies how flowspec routes should be sorted.
This commit implements what it says.
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
Could be crash.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
paths in Destination.knownPathList are referenced by peer's adj-rib-in
when there was no policy modification applied to avoid unnecessary copy.
Here in Destination.explicitWithdraw(), we are using Path.IsWithdraw as
a flag to signify which path stays in knownPathList and which not.
Since the paths are referenced by peer's adj-rib-in, we must flag this
down after use.
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
older path get preference
can be disabled by
`global.route-selection-options.external-compare-router-id = true`
close #806
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
Nobody uses them.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
When received withdrawals don't match with existing knownPathList,
we must ignore them.
This commit fixes not to store un-matched withdrawals in
`dest.withdrawList` to avoid unintentional withdrawal.
see test case for detail
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
When mod action is used in route server configuration,
`Destination.knownPathList` holds multiple modified paths whose original path
is same.
In that case, when the original path is withdrawn, we must remove all
modified paths.
There was a wrong `break` in `Destination.explicitWithdraw()` which avoids
this.
test is also added to check the behavior.
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
Later, we move non-bgp protocol stuff like mrt under their own
direcotries.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
Withdrawn pathes are kept to be referenced thus the memory for them
are not freed. Kill oldKnownPathList and Destination's NewFeed().
Destination's Calculate() returns the best paths.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
validation
Withdrawn pathes are kept to be referenced thus the memory for them
are not freed. Nobody uses this so let's remove it.
Paths in UpdatedPathList are also in KnownPathList so doesn't lead to
memory leak. But remove it for simplicity.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
Implicitly withdrawn pathes are kept to be referenced thus the memory
for them are not freed. Nobody uses this so let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
$ gobgp rpki validate
validates all the paths in the table with the current ROAs.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
- handle withdraw
- added some new info (peer address, timestamp, aspath attribute)
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
the result of memory profile (500 route-server-clients each of them
advertises 100 routes)
before:
(pprof) top5
3913.02MB of 3978.69MB total (98.35%)
Dropped 148 nodes (cum <= 19.89MB)
Showing top 10 nodes out of 11 (cum >= 21MB)
flat flat% sum% cum cum%
2970.30MB 74.66% 74.66% 2975.80MB 74.79% github.com/osrg/gobgp/server.filterpath
810.09MB 20.36% 95.02% 810.59MB 20.37% github.com/osrg/gobgp/table.(*AdjRib).Update
115.60MB 2.91% 97.92% 119.10MB 2.99% github.com/osrg/gobgp/table.createUpdateMsgFromPath
10MB 0.25% 98.17% 1878.02MB 47.20% github.com/osrg/gobgp/server.(*BgpServer).propagateUpdate
4.50MB 0.11% 98.29% 144.60MB 3.63% github.com/osrg/gobgp/table.CreateUpdateMsgFromPaths
after:
(pprof) top5
1259.49MB of 1284.27MB total (98.07%)
Dropped 175 nodes (cum <= 6.42MB)
Showing top 10 nodes out of 26 (cum >= 36.51MB)
flat flat% sum% cum cum%
975.81MB 75.98% 75.98% 976.31MB 76.02% github.com/osrg/gobgp/table.(*AdjRib).Update
198.67MB 15.47% 91.45% 208.17MB 16.21% github.com/osrg/gobgp/table.createUpdateMsgFromPath
22MB 1.71% 93.16% 22MB 1.71% github.com/osrg/gobgp/packet.(*IPAddrPrefix).Serialize
20MB 1.56% 94.72% 707.19MB 55.07% github.com/osrg/gobgp/server.(*BgpServer).propagateUpdate
13.50MB 1.05% 95.77% 13.50MB 1.05% github.com/osrg/gobgp/table.NewPath
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
the result of memory profile (500 route-server-clients each of them advertises
100 routes)
before:
(pprof) top5
9330.48MB of 9367.53MB total (99.60%)
Dropped 157 nodes (cum <= 46.84MB)
Showing top 10 nodes out of 17 (cum >= 9334.17MB)
flat flat% sum% cum cum%
6163.04MB 65.79% 65.79% 6163.04MB 65.79% github.com/osrg/gobgp/table.NewPath
1155.05MB 12.33% 78.12% 7302.59MB 77.96% github.com/osrg/gobgp/table.(*Path).Clone
986.31MB 10.53% 88.65% 1388.81MB 14.83% github.com/osrg/gobgp/table.(*AdjRib).Update
402.51MB 4.30% 92.95% 402.51MB 4.30% fmt.Sprintf
402.51MB 4.30% 97.24% 402.51MB 4.30% net.parseIPv4
after:
(pprof) top
3913.02MB of 3978.69MB total (98.35%)
Dropped 148 nodes (cum <= 19.89MB)
Showing top 10 nodes out of 11 (cum >= 21MB)
flat flat% sum% cum cum%
2970.30MB 74.66% 74.66% 2975.80MB 74.79% github.com/osrg/gobgp/server.filterpath
810.09MB 20.36% 95.02% 810.59MB 20.37% github.com/osrg/gobgp/table.(*AdjRib).Update
115.60MB 2.91% 97.92% 119.10MB 2.99% github.com/osrg/gobgp/table.createUpdateMsgFromPath
10MB 0.25% 98.17% 1878.02MB 47.20% github.com/osrg/gobgp/server.(*BgpServer).propagateUpdate
4.50MB 0.11% 98.29% 144.60MB 3.63% github.com/osrg/gobgp/table.CreateUpdateMsgFromPaths
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
// toml by default
$ gobgpd -f gobgpd.toml
// use -t to change configuration type
$ gobgpd -t yaml -f gobgpd.yaml
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
speed up and reduce memory footprint
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
remove one loop.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
this is a preparation for add-path recv/send feature
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
When two peers advertise exactly same path, one will be marked as best, and
another will not. In this case, in ToApiStruct(), we mustn't mark a path
as best by Equal() method since Equal() compare path's content, not identity.
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
fsm needs it with the later commit.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
also clean up functions to create a radix key.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
api/Grpc is too general for package/service name.
rename them to gobgpapi/GobgpApi.
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Yokoi <yokoi.hiroshi@po.ntts.co.jp>
|
|
scenario_test is also added
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
same as ipv4.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
TableManager.localAsn wasn't used.
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
Usage
$ gobgp mrt inject global <filename> [<count>]
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
$ gobgp mrt dump 10 -o ./dump
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
if we add same path multiple times by the following gobgp cli commands,
$ gobgp global rib add 10.0.0.0/24
$ gobgp global rib add 10.0.0.0/24
$ gobgp global rib add 10.0.0.0/24
current implementation sends multiple update messages to peers
even through the content of the path is same.
This is due to the shallow equivalence checking.
This patch checks paths' equivalence deeper by adding Equal() method to Path.
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
Path/Destination/Table was defined as interface.
Simplify by making them normal struct.
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
original code assumes locally generated path's source is nil, which is
not true. use isLocal() instead.
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
this patch fixes the wrong behavior shown below
$ gobgp global rib add 10.0.0.0/24
$ gobgp global rib del 10.0.0.0/24
$ gobgp global rib
Network Next Hop AS_PATH Age Attrs
*> 10.0.0.0/24 0.0.0.0 65000 00:05:48 [{Origin: IGP}]
since we used to compare path's source by PeerInfo's pointer, locally
originated routes is considered as a different route even if they have
same prefix.
this patch introduce Equal() method to compare PeerInfo's content and
fix this wrong behavior.
Signed-off-by: ISHIDA Wataru <ishida.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
Peers send and receive messages via channels, which could lead to a
deadlock. With this patch, multiple goroutines are used for network
I/Os per peer but one goroutine handle all ribs (including the global
rib). So there is no messages via channels between peers.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
|