Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Remove support for historic Linux kernels,
merge krt-iface, krt-set and krt-scan stub headers.
|
|
OS-dependent functions renamed to be more consistent,
prepared to merge krt-set and krt-scan headers.
Name changes:
struct krt_if_params -> struct kif_params
struct krt_if_status -> struct kif_status
struct krt_set/scan_params -> struct krt_params
struct krt_set/scan_status -> struct krt_status
krt_if_params_same -> kif_sys_reconfigure
krt_if_copy_params -> kif_sys_copy_config
krt_set/scan_params_same -> krt_sys_reconfigure
krt_set/scan_copy_params -> krt_sys_copy_config
krt_if_scan -> kif_do_scan
krt_set_notify -> krt_do_notify
krt_scan_fire -> krt_do_scan
krt_if_ -> kif_sys_
krt_scan_ -> krt_sys_
krt_set_ -> krt_sys_
|
|
Based on the patch from Alexander V. Chernikov.
Extended to support almost all protocols.
Uses 'protocol bgp NAME from TEMPLATE { ... }' syntax.
|
|
|
|
depend on the startup counter hack now and uses a zero-time timer instead
to make itself scheduled after normal protocol startup.
|
|
The new kernel syncer is cleanly split between generic UNIX module
and OS dependent submodules:
- krt.c (the generic part)
- krt-iface (low-level functions for interface handling)
- krt-scan (low-level functions for routing table scanning)
- krt-set (low-level functions for setting of kernel routes)
krt-set and krt-iface are common for all BSD-like Unices, krt-scan is heavily
system dependent (most Unices require /dev/kmem parsing, Linux uses /proc),
Netlink substitues all three modules.
We expect each UNIX port supports kernel routing table scanning, kernel
interface table scanning, kernel route manipulation and possibly also
asynchronous event notifications (new route, interface state change;
not implemented yet) and build the KRT protocol on the top of these
primitive operations.
|
|
routes) from kernel routing tables unless the "persist" switch is set.
|
|
|
|
and does things "the right way". Few things are still missing (device
routes etc.), I'll add them later in the evening.
|
|
by other programs or the kernel itself is not supported yet, but it's not
needed for development of other protocols.
|
|
the kernel routing table as opposed to modifying it which is approximately
the same on non-netlink systems, I've split the kernel routing table
routines to read and write parts. To be implemented later ;-)
|